Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

am thinking of purachsing an rb25 turbo from a series 2 R33 (apparently with the nylon compressor wheel)...

EXACTLY what would i need to make this fit onto my rb20?

eg oil/water lines? any other things?

also, what markings would this turbo have on it to ensure i am getting a series 2 turbo and not getting ripped off?

And.. when i get the turbo, should i get it checked out, or just get it bolted on?

finally, how much would labour be you think?

cheers,

Warren

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/109753-rb25-turbo-onto-rb20det/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=109532

this is the turbo.. (pics there)

it says 45v2 does that sound like one with the nylon compressor to you?

can someone elaborate?

its a little more $ than a standard rb25 one, but if its got the nylon wheel then i would pay it..

PS i did search and nothing concrete about what to use..

thanks gordon for the link!

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=90242&hl=

ok the above thread confirms it is an r33 series 2 turbo with the nylon compressor wheel :mad: , and i paid $410 for it

unfortunately i am not able to do this myself, even though i can hold a spanner...

what do you think as far as price for a workshop to do the install?

also add the costs of new trubo/manifold and turbo/exhaust gaskets..

i would upgrade to a split dump at the same time if you have the cash.. they make a fair bit of difference. (if you havent already)

new copper gaskets on the banjo bolts are a good idea too.

might not hurt to get someone to check the turbo too (couple of places so they dont try to talk you into a rebuild), just so you know your getting what you payed for..

gaskets cost about $30 I think.

install should cost about $250-$300

don't forget to use the actuator off the stock RB20 turbo on the new turbo.

gives you 10 psi whout boost conrtoller as the stock one does.

oh..

other than the Elbow off the turbo, you will also have to drill and tap a nipple on to the compressor cover or intercooler pipe for the wastegate hose.

to drill the comp cover, you will need to take it off the turbo.

I guess same goes for intercooler pipe.

Edited by GTST

Personally I have no idea - all I know is as the seller of the turbo, a) it is in very good condition, and was inspected by Bill at Adelaide Turbo Services, and b) I got reamed by SAU member Hooman who I bought this off from as a "R34 Neo turbo" and paid $650 for it.

Brendan :thumbsup:

Edited by Tangles

no no.... it's a good price.

just saying that on the RB25, there is a boost controller solenoid.

the hose goes from the intercooler pipe to the solenoide then through to the wastegate actuator.

on the rb20, the wastegate spring controlls the boost. it reaches about 10psi in stock form.

so there is no other controller so the vacuum hose goes from actuator to the compressor cover.

so to use this on the rb20, you need to drill and tap a nipple on to the compressor cover like in the rb20 turbo or drill and tap a nipple on the intercooler pipe like in the rb25.

I think you didn't sell him the ELBOW pipe (refers to the first part of the intercooler pipe) which is needed.

If you don't get that, you have to use the rb20 one and to do so, you have to drill out the 3 holes very close to the edges to make it match the larger rb25 opening.

when you use the rb20 actuator, on the rb25 turbo, you still run 10 psi through it.

and considering it is a larger turbo, it flows 25% more air at 10psi than the stock turbo at 10psi.

WARREN - use your boost controller anyway. it will help bring boost on quicker.

12 psi through the rb25 turbo is what I ran on my last car.

well it would drop to 11psi towards redline anyway. but I forgot to use the rb20 actuator so the bleed valve was making it boost fro the 7psi stock to 12psi..

I will be using 14psi through rb25 turbo for my current car.

when I buy it and install it that is.

GTST - as always, great advice.. thanks

so do you think its worth finding hte rb25 "elbow pipe" before i fit this, or just modifying the rb20 one?

keeping in mind that i will be taing this to a workshop and saying "do what you need to make it fit"

i'm thinkin of going to mercury motorsport so they know their skylines backwards and have probably done this uprade a few times...

that way if they need to get gaskets they can organise all that jazz, and whatever needs to be modified is done by them and added onto the price

CHECK THE WATERLINES!!!!

I can't believe there are all these responses and no one thought to ask whether it was an early or late r32.

Late rb20 has the same size banjos as the rb25, Early rb20 does not. You may need custom lines for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...