Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a a r34 rb26 in need of a rebuild and need help!!

the car it is in is a ex D1GP car and is obviously used for drift.

it has run a bearing (1 or more) possibly due to oil surge

anyway it is now due for a rebuild, we were atleast going to go

pistons, rings, rods, n1 oil pump, trust extension kit, is highly likely we will need a new crank

as we realised what was happening quite late ( can't hear anything over the 3 fuel pumps)

we were going to go with the first stage hks 2.8l kit but evidently the block wouldn't like it

and we would need an N1 item, so that scraps that idea also we were told that we may aswell

throw the engne away as bits of bearing would be scattered throughtout the engine (i thought a good flush and tidy up/porting would be sweat!)

any way what options do i have with the crank, scatered metal in the engine, etc.

ps we are looking for around 600-700hp rear wheels (we have all the externals to handle that and more!)

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110005-r34-rb26-rebuild-time-drift-spec/
Share on other sites

yeah 450-500kw drifter

it is nuts already but hey can never have enough and since it needs a rebuild anyway

it did a team event with kuroi at an option 2 event in 2004 i think,

anyway, do i need a n1 block for 450-500kw? with a stage 1 hks 2.8l kit?

what are my other options with the crank what is good out there and what $$

any of you guys that has had an rb26 expire in the same way have any problems

with debris through the engine?

ohh and yes it is a four door

cheers guys

might even post a pic of one of the laps before it let go

yeah 450-500kw drifter

it is nuts already but hey can never have enough and since it needs a rebuild anyway

it did a team event with kuroi at an option 2 event in 2004 i think,

anyway, do i need a n1 block for 450-500kw? with a stage 1 hks 2.8l kit?

what are my other options with the crank what is good out there and what $$

any of you guys that has had an rb26 expire in the same way have any problems

with debris through the engine?

ohh and yes it is a four door

cheers guys

might even post a pic of one of the laps before it let go

u got jun 2.7L billet, full counterweight crank, tomei 2.8L (not full counterwieght i dont think) and the hks 2.8L crank, though there a few different hks cranks in the 2.8L depending on power. and n1 block is only 3K i was told which if i knew when i did mine id be using one str8 up, not worth risking on a normal block when they are sooo cheap :down: plenty of options around, try searching the site for stroker kits as their was a large thread on it a fair while ago now discussing all the options :(

show us some pics :( is it a skyline or a chaser going by the jzx (rb26 powered) as your listed car?

at the time it blew it had 334kw rear wheels and 1100nm of torque but that was detuned running pump gas.

the head has all the bits (may be looking at new cams if debris got up there though).

Was told that the r34 block was basically similar to the n1 in design ( with extra ribing for greater torsional strength stopping cracking in the block at hi rpm) , would be going for the first stage

2.8l kit the second and third is a bit overthe top

yeah its a mark 2 toyota powered by a r34 rb26

post-27431-1142630382.jpg

350rwkw is a much smarter, cheap and more reliable approach than 500rwkw.

plus drifting is more about car setup than power.

personally stick under the 400rwkw marker, far better response and throttle control can be achieved. And thats what you need correct?

yeah decided 500kw is a bit over the top but would like 400kw, the power hits in an awkward time for me anyway and was going with the stage one 2.8 kit (highest compression version) to move the torque down in the range a little bit with a bit of response (would this be the case?)

as for the power in drifters issue have you seen kuroi's 900ps onevia powered by rb26, but yeah i do agree

does any one know if the r34 block is similar to the n1 in design ( with extra ribing for greater torsional strength stopping cracking in the block at hi rpm)?

btw the track is in NZ pukekohe infact (mega entry speeds into that sweeper!)

my work brought in a 33 gtst x Garage Aqua track car from Japan with r34 n1 crank, rods and oversized pistons stroked the 25 to a 2.7lt its fitted with a RX6 made 355rwkw on flat out mode i.e 1.8 bar

Its super responsive span the semi slicks up in third without any problems on 1.2 bar.

the guy that bought it drifts it on 1 to 1.2 bar so just on 280 - 300rwkw plenty of power

R34GTR (RB26DETT) block measures up exactly the same as an R32GTR N1 block. Personally I think the N1 block is under utilised in a 450 rwkw application, a standard block will handle that easily.

My 20 cents…….

Dismantle the R34GTR RB26DETT, clean it up and work out exactly what it is that you need to replace. Then get on with the rebuild stick a standard crank, some good rods, bearings and pistons in it and control the oil temperature and flow properly. It will handle the power you want easily and with a decently ported cylinder head and 9 to 1 compression ratio it will have all the response you need. Ceramic coat the piston crowns, the combustion chambers and the exhaust ports for the superior temperature control and a further improvement in response.

:P cheers :)

thanks Sydneykid, i thought the 34 block was similar and could handle over what we wanted, will

look into your suggestions engines in the process of coming out at the mo.

one of the strong reasons we were looking at the hks kit is that it would only be alittle more (not much at all) to get it than get all the bits and a good stock crank :P

(over here anyway)

still cant belive it had oil surge after competeing in d1gp and other japanese events

only thing i can think of is they ran it over full?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...