Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure if anyone has said this yet... But have you taken a look at the solenoid? Mine was doing that about 5 days back... I real loud ticking, I was left wondering what the hell it was - so i adjusted the IEBC a little an it was gone. But yeah the solenoid makes a very loud ticking!

Not sure if anyone has said this yet... But have you taken a look at the solenoid? Mine was doing that about 5 days back... I real loud ticking, I was left wondering what the hell it was - so i adjusted the IEBC a little an it was gone. But yeah the solenoid makes a very loud ticking!

wot solenoid?

the boost solenoid

wtf is that? And why wood it fu after a plug and oil change.??

remember i'm talkin bout a 13.

Edited by 66yostagea
wtf is that? And why wood it fu after a plug and oil change.??

remember i'm talkin bout a 13.

Sounds like something (and I don't know what) was stuck and after the extra additive was freed, might have just been a coincidence though and could have come good on it's own... Keep thrashing it and I'm sure it will come back sooner or later then you'll know for sure! :) Sounds like it is internal though, close to impossible to diagnose at this point.

As for the Manifold nuts going missing (mentioned a couple of months back sorry) the nuts are stainless steel and they use them so they don't seize on themanifold, so you can get it off without snapping all the studs off. Down side is that they can come loose and even fall off after a while so that is probably the explanation for missing nuts on various manifolds... Mine were loose on the turbo manifold and were causing an exhaust leak that was a scream at higher rpm but it developed into a leak at lower and lower rpm as time passed, tightened the nuts and all fixed.

Don't know enough about the S13 Turbo system to comment on the boost solenoid, you have one on the Stagea though, check out the boost control thread in the DIY's for more info. Basically 2 satge boost is standard on the RB25DET.

Cheers

Luke

Edited by munchdesign

Thanks for that Luke.

With the S.S nuts ,the S.S has a greater rate of thermal expanstionthansteel.After heating and coling many hundreds of times they start to work loose,

Thanks for that Luke.

With the S.S nuts ,the S.S has a greater rate of thermal expanstionthansteel.After heating and coling many hundreds of times they start to work loose,

No worries,

Does being S.S make them softer too?

sure its not your fuel injectors mate? i know mine are noisy. was curious about the clicking myself, had a good listen, sourced it to the fuel rail, and there you go.

(tappets in an overhead cam engine...? eh?)

and stainless steel is harder, but more brittle. The softer steel bolts are more maleable, would screw in and the thread would move slightly as you tighten, to form a really tight snug fit to whatever youre screwing it into.

stainless, being harder, doesnt do this as much. being harder and less maleable lowers the risk of shearing the head off when you undo it after 10 years, but means that it doesnt sit quite as snug, and can rattle out.

this is also why stainless steel exhausts can crack after a few years, but sound better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...