Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im thinking if putting my line to a auto not so sure at the moment i built the car to go fast in a straight line and im think if its a auto with the right gear i could knock 1 sec off a 1/4 mile time there abouts

i need to know the power rating of a auto box n what it can handle im looking at 350 rwkw so thats a heap more at he g/box

i also need to know how hard it is to convert i have a power fc to does that help

what gear should i use can someone help me out

if all is good i would liek to swap full manual conversion for something along these lines

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/112027-auto-compaired-to-manual/
Share on other sites

have a talk to jamie at xspeed (in w.a.) or see a performance workshop in your area, i have just gone the other way as it is cheaper to go faster in a manual, but if you want to spend the coin, a auto would be better at bigger power levels.

Edited by Pal

if you want that power reliabily with an aftermarket ecu (such as pfc) then you should be speaking to some guys on calais turbo and find out how much it will cost to get a vlt box installed. they are pretty tuff and are mechanical (so wont be affected by ecu).

but what other mods do you have on your car?

theres lots of other ways to make the car quicker for the 1/4

without changing the geabox. an auto skyline would be so boring

VLT Jatco built by someone that knows them will handle the power and dont need to have any input from the engine ECU.Theres a car in WA thats done strong 10s with a Jatco using many Ford C4 race parts.

We tryed to put 500+rwhp thru a built Skyline Jatco 2 weeks ago,Box failed after 2 power runs.

Most Drag cars are Auto.

im thinking if putting my line to a auto not so sure at the moment i built the car to go fast in a straight line and im think if its a auto with the right gear i could knock 1 sec off a 1/4 mile time there abouts

i need to know the power rating of a auto box n what it can handle im looking at 350 rwkw so thats a heap more at he g/box

i also need to know how hard it is to convert i have a power fc to does that help

what gear should i use can someone help me out

if all is good i would liek to swap full manual conversion for something along these lines

u can use a trimatic auto get it tricked up with bigger clutches and manual valve body there is a custom bellhousing that u can get to make it fit to a rb series engine these autos will handle the power that u need when built right and the good thing is u dont have to worry about the auto ecu as they dont have one

ok well what mods do you have out of curisoity?

average power makes the car quicker so perhaps you could sort that out?

or even different ratios? lighter car? better to go faster with less weight than more power? nos? slicks?

i will be running slicks

sorry keep in mind this is a 350rwkw street car driven like evey second day i have a over size block port n polished head forged pistons high mount turbo t70 turbo and a shyt load more i have a locker diff to go in this week

i think i wanna keep the manual just in case i need to swap it if the auto breaks or if i sell it what prices would i be looking at does anyone have a idea

please keep the info comin

and whats the vic drag challange?

why dont you go the bottom end and make more power with displacement? if you want more power that is, im assuming? the vic drag day is a drag day at heathcote for sau vic members. we have booked the track for a "drag day" for our exclusive use.

what suspension mods have u got?

well atm im look at some drag shocks and something like 90/10 front for drags and also i have already built my bottom end very tuff

i dont really belive i need any more power i have a heap of torque i see 202's making hardly any power but can run a 10 / 11 sec 1/4

how much it cost for entry at the drags

Ill tell you know, if you can drive the auto right, its pretty quick through twisties and many other cars will struggle to keep up.

when i rebuild my auto, i will get keas to work on it. They say they have packages for whatever power needs you have.

350rwkw is good enough for a very mid-low 10 with a properly setup auto and slicks

Its car setup/weight dependant.

I've seen many a VL go through for a high 10 with 300rwkw

It isnt as cheap as manual to setup, but there is less stress on the drivetrain so diffs, tailshafts etc... dont break as often

Especially because your using slicks where a high rpm launch is gonna stress parts

yer well remeber this car is a daily car lol not to sure bout chassie work n shyt it seems that auto need attention all the time i wasnt goin to go the way of gtst box can anyone recomend the best box to run behind a r33 i was thinking of selling the car but i might keep it now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...