Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could someone confirm the effects of rear toe either, toe in, 0 or toe out, especially for R33 Skyline GTS-Ts.

Pretty sure I understand front toe effects but still not 100% sure what happens with the rear. Is it simply the reverse of the front, ie. front toe in induces understeer due to less overall grip, so rear toe in induces oversteer becuase of the same reasons?

SK has recommended 2mm toe in for the rear end of my car (as part of other recommendations) to help dial out rear oversteer which I'm still trying to get my head around.

Cheers!

Edited by Freebaggin
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113257-rear-toe/
Share on other sites

Toe out can be referred to as an "ubstabilising" setting

Toe in is considered a "stabilising" setting

So if you want more response, go for toe out

If, on the othe hand, you want more stability, go for toe in

Hence toe out on the front makes that end of the car more lively, reponsive to inputs such as steering. Toe out is on the front is good for improving the initial turn in to a corner for example.

Conversely toe in on the rear makes that end of the car more stable, less reponsive to inputs such as power application. Toe in is good for decreasing the power oversteer on corner exit for example.

As always you get nothing for nothing.

If you run toe in on the rear to help decrease the power oversteer the side effect is more reluctance to run into the corner. The rear end remains stable rather than move out to assist the turn.

So the common RWD Skyline setting is toe in on the rear and toe out on the front.

That should be enough to get you thinking

:) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113257-rear-toe/#findComment-2088271
Share on other sites

Could someone confirm the effects of rear toe either, toe in, 0 or toe out, especially for R33 Skyline GTS-Ts.

Pretty sure I understand front toe effects but still not 100% sure what happens with the rear. Is it simply the reverse of the front, ie. front toe in induces understeer due to less overall grip, so rear toe in induces oversteer becuase of the same reasons?

SK has recommended 2mm toe in for the rear end of my car (as part of other recommendations) to help dial out rear oversteer which I'm still trying to get my head around.

Cheers!

The key to understaning rear toe effects is to understand how a tyre generate cornering grip. Put simply, when turning a corner there will always be a difference between the direction the tyre is pointing and the direction in which it is headed. This is known as the slip angle. Up to the grip limit of the tyre the higher the slip angle the higher the cornering grip. The amount of grip the tyre generates is also proportional to the load on the tyre, ie vertical force acting on it. The more downforce on the tyre the more grip it can generate.

If you think about the rear suspension, when travelling in a straight line the two rear tyres, by courtesy of the toe in, are both generating a cornering force - but they are cancelling each other out. When one rear tyre is loaded more than the other (ie the outside wheel when cornering) the toe in/out on this wheel becomes the point of interest and the inside wheel can largely be ignored.

If you put toe in on the rear suspension (ie front of the wheel pointing in)you are, when cornering, essentially doing the same thing to the rear of the car as turning the steering wheel does to the front. This makes the car, in a relative sense, understeer a little more than it might otherwise.

If you put toe out (ie front of the wheel pointing out) you will have the effect of adding a little more oversteer to the car when cornering.

The point to be a little careful of is that when you go over a bump in the road and this only hits one wheel - too much toe in will make the car steer from the rear. Not much fun.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113257-rear-toe/#findComment-2088303
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
So that's 2mm TOTAL toe in on the rear or 2mm each for a total of 4mm?

That’s 2 mm each side, be specific with the aligner. Some of the dumber ones think the rear is the same as the front and they can set it at 4 mm total toe in.

:D cheers :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113257-rear-toe/#findComment-2216245
Share on other sites

the amount of wear would come down to how much camber vs toe. my skyline has been lowered and i was told that instead of getting a camber kit, get the toe matched to the camber to make the tyres wear evenly.

the more toe in you have, the more outside wear you get and more toe out the more inside wear you get.

so if you have lots of camber and lots of toe out you would get extreme inside wear.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113257-rear-toe/#findComment-2219317
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...