Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Poor example graph IMO.

there is no way the HKS 3040 is that laggy. Simply no chance its only making 240rwkw @ 5800rpm.

There is something very much wrong with that comparison

considering my GT30 (garrett version) delivered power much smoother than that 25g graph.

Its not about making the numbers, its power delivery.

The older Trust turbos power delivery is snappy and that causes wheelspin. Yeah it makes the car feel fast as it comes on boost with a rush, but the GT30 i had was so progressive you didnt even know it was feeding in from 5 psi to 20psi

How is it a poor example graph if its an almost identical setup, the same dyno and two comparable turbo's to those in question ?

Secondly...

If its not about making numbers, than whats your issue with it making 240rwkw @ 5800rpm ?

That should mean nothing to you, its all about power delivery isnt it ?

The graph above shows the td06 makes approximately 80kw further peak power output, a quicker peak boost mark by approximately 1000rpm (taking into account your claims of excessive lag) and the boost is held more constant through the rev range and fades less and more gradually from the trust turbo even though the Garrett item is running more boost.

Regardless of lag.... the garrett turbo has peaked its power output and the graph has started to flatten out before the td06 has even peaked yet. Reduce the size of the exhaust housing to combat this monster lag that is unacceptable in your opinion. Thus reducing the peak output of the turbo, ur even further behind, might spool quicker, but now your (lets say for arguements sake) 100kw down on the trust turbo due to the garrett no longer having the room to deal with the exhaust gases required to pull bigger numbers.

Throw a good set of rubber underneath that and deal with the wheelspin coz the benefits are clear in my opinion :D Snappy VS Crappy...

The 3040 had a bigger A/R housing then you would normally expect. Im still pretty sold on the old Trust turbos. And whilst on the same dyno they were tuend by different ppl.

How can you say the power delivery is snappy by looking at that graph?

Oh come off it, are you still drunk from Sunday Night's escapades? :D

If your saying there is nothing wrong with a HKS3040 making 240rwkw on 20psi... then you still either drunk or hungover. There is something seriously wrong there

You know damn well my Garrett item was on around 4000rpm give or take and it was making a lot more than 240rwkw on less boost with a factory head

Either give more specs of the car with the 3040 (like the fact it probably dropped 2 piston rings), or retire the comments on that comparo as IMO they are totally incorrect

The bigger A/R will simply induce more lag, peak power should, if anything, be more.

benigno - i aint gonna get ringht into a reply to your post as i dont believe the comparo graph is anything near accurate based on what i've seen with my very own car.

Also if you want, have a look through this thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...ic=55845&st=100

in particluar these items.. which i might add are not running upto the boost leve the GT30 can without being out of the efficiency map either

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1132220269.jpg

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1132220440.jpg

http://www.notonmonday.com/images/myupgrad...T30rPSI_web.jpg

You tell me the comparo graph is accurate now :D

Its totally wrong... and as you can see the Garretts here, whilst make 20-30rwkw less, are making much more power, much sooner, much smoother

There are more graphs around here, i'll leave it to you to go find them

cheers.

Oh come off it, are you still drunk from Sunday Night's escapades? :D

If your saying there is nothing wrong with a HKS3040 making 240rwkw on 20psi... then you still either drunk or hungover. There is something seriously wrong there

You know damn well my Garrett item was on around 4000rpm give or take and it was making a lot more than 240rwkw on less boost with a factory head

Either give more specs of the car with the 3040 (like the fact it probably dropped 2 piston rings), or retire the comments on that comparo as IMO they are totally incorrect

The bigger A/R will simply induce more lag, peak power should, if anything, be more.

benigno - i aint gonna get ringht into a reply to your post as i dont believe the comparo graph is anything near accurate based on what i've seen with my very own car.

Also if you want, have a look through this thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...ic=55845&st=100

in particluar these items.. which i might add are not running upto the boost leve the GT30 can without being out of the efficiency map either

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1132220269.jpg

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1132220440.jpg

http://www.notonmonday.com/images/myupgrad...T30rPSI_web.jpg

You tell me the comparo graph is accurate now ;)

Its totally wrong... and as you can see the Garretts here, whilst make 20-30rwkw less, are making much more power, much sooner, much smoother

There are more graphs around here, i'll leave it to you to go find them

cheers.

Hehehehe nah I can see what your getting at man and I agree thats underpar for a 3040 :D just having a stir, and trying to make ppl see that just coz they are slightly older doesnt mean you can write them off completely.

For the price and specs, they do a damn good job at delivering the goods and im very happy with mine ;)

Yeh, I agree that the 3040 isnt making the numbers it should…but the car still ran an 12.1 at good mph with that setup so it was making reasonable power.

Anyway, I say it still makes for an interesting comparison…I have a casual look from time to time and compare ppls Garret setups with the 25G setup and not many make the same peak power, and making the power that this thing did at 5,000rpm.

So whilst the 3040 is under done a little, feel free to post up any GT30 on a std RB25 with baby cams…id be curious to see some making more power. Actually, id be curious to see an RB26 with 2530s and how that compares to the 25G plot????

Actually, found this old info of B-man old car that ran the exact same 3040.

Boost starts at 3000

3500 = 5 PSI and 80 rwkw

4000 = 8 PSI and 112 rwkw

4500 = 20 PSI and 200rwkw

5000 = 23 PSI and 260 rwkw

5500 = 22.5 PSI and 270 rwkw

6000 = 22 PSI and 310 rwkw

6500 = 21 PSI and 323 rwkw

That was an earlier turbo setup on my white car Ash, the 25G is Brett's old setup.

Either way you look at it, with 3 motors + cars with near identical bolt ons (Greddy plenums, 550cc injectors, aftermarket turbo kits, intercoolers, cams etc) Brett's car still kicked the shit out of mine or Brendan's car.... and Brendan's had a rebuilt motor.

Made more power, and did alot more MPH than either HKS 3040 car.

The 25G comp wheel is between the GT30R and GT35R - similar inducer to a GT35R but smaller exducer

im interested in the Td06-25g seems like a good turbo and looks to be good for the 300rwkw im chasing!!! if you dont want lag then you will have to give up the high power yer?? also what cams are suitible for this turbo?? i have an RB25DET cheers

one of the leading turbo experts here in nz swears by the mitsi turbos (trust or greddy dont make them)

ive seen plenty of examples on evo's where the td06 turbos are flowing better than the garrett gt equivilant.

they are both a good turbo and im sure both of them would do the trick and nicely. i also agree that new technology isnt always best. its more about getting a turbo that has well proportioned wheels/housings etc

the garrett gt2540 is a great example of a new turbo with poorly proportioned wheels and housings and subsequently its a lag monster.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...