Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Advice needed!

I have a 33 gtr with 18 x 10 front and rear wrapped in 265/35/18. I also have Tein coliovers (jap spec and just height adjustable). I have had my two front tyres scrub out within 10,000 KM down to the canvas on the inside. Obviously this is a camber issue and I've had a wheel allignment just conducted and the mechanic said that the camber cannot be adjusted anymore and they sit at -3 degrees at the front. The rears are just under -2 degrees so aren't as bad as the fronts and are wearing OK.

Can the 33 GTR handle 10" rims on the front? If so how can I adjust the front camber to handle the 18x10" rims the cheapest way. Is it camber kits or adjustable pillow mounts or up grade suspension? I'm a bit lost *scratches head*

Any advice is appreciated from the group.

Cheers

Edited by TOY 33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113950-33-gtr-front-camber-issues/
Share on other sites

Three degrees is alot of camber for the road.

One of your cheaper options is the Whiteline camber adjustment kits. The front end will give you +/- one degree and the rear kit +/- 0.75 degree (You can use two kits on the rear). You probably need to remove a degree from either end.

Question for you - what is the ride height? Also what sway bars do you have?

Edited by djr81
Three degrees is alot of camber for the road.

One of your cheaper options is the Whiteline camber adjustment kits. The front end will give you +/- one degree and the rear kit +/- 0.75 degree (You can use two kits on the rear). You probably need to remove a degree from either end.

Question for you - what is the ride height? Also what sway bars do you have?

Ride height is not too low, just under legal however have a 3.5" exhaust which sits low. I think it would be about 1-1.5 inches below standard? I think the sway bars are all standard GTR, I'll check when I get home. Thanks for the help keep the advice coming :D

Measure from the underside of the guard to the centre of the wheel. The more you lower a Skyline the more -ve camber you get. Although -3 degrees sounds like alot if you have only lowered it by and inch.

If you have a look in the group buys section you should find a group buy for the R33 Gt-R for Whiteline bits. I would suggest the camber kits & some adjustable sway bars is a good start.

Ride height is not too low, just under legal however have a 3.5" exhaust which sits low. I think it would be about 1-1.5 inches below standard? I think the sway bars are all standard GTR, I'll check when I get home. Thanks for the help keep the advice coming :spank:

As the guys have said, ride height is critical, so measure it. If it's below 355 mm (centre of wheel to guard) on the front and 345 mm on the rear then it's too low. Raise it up to 355/345 and then meaure the camber. I have never seen an R33GTR go much over 2 degrees at that height.

This is what is usually needed for each height increment, note that all measurements are centre of wheel to guard;

Standard (new) height is 380 mm front and 370 mm rear

360/350 mm needs only the standard rear camber adjusters

350/340 mm needs 1 front camber kit and 1 rear camber kit

340/330 mm needs I front camber kit and 2 rear camber kits

The Group Buy link for R33GTR follows;

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=87826

As well as all of the prices, it has some usefull tips and feed back from the guys.

:P cheers :D

Thanks Heaps!

Will get the measuring tools out tonight and may contact you Sydneykid to purchase some of the camber kits because of your time taken to reply it is appreciated *stops kissing ass* :P

Looks like I may have to raise the old girl abit :spank:

Thanks again guys for your input.

Have just measured the height of the GTR last night and found that the front and rear are both set at 345mm :laugh:

Will be raising the front on the weekend ( :) for adjustable coilovers) up to 355mm and see how it looks. If I don't like it that high I will be ordering a front camber kit and lowering the front back down

Once I raise the front up 10mm, will I need a new wheel alignment, or will it automatically reduce the negative camber?

Also is there any difference in having the front the same height as the back?

:D

Um, it is not about the ATTESSA system. It is about the relationship between the COG & the roll centres at either end of the car. Lowering a GT-R too much makes the roll centre migrate & will give you odd handling.

Most people find that the camber kit for the rear is needed before the front - this is simply a function of the suspension geometry. 10mm will help, but may not make a whole heap of difference.

Wheel alignment? Other than the rear camber settings and the front & rear toe setting unless you get the Whitleine kits there isn't really much you can align. Having said that it is usually $60 well spent.

Before you start (Friday afternoon may be a good time) have a look at the state of the threads on the dampers. If they look to be grotty & horrible & seized give the threads a hose with some WD40 before you get handy with the C spanners.

Wheel alignment? Other than the rear camber settings and the front & rear toe setting unless you get the Whitleine kits there isn't really much you can align. Having said that it is usually $60 well spent.

Before you start (Friday afternoon may be a good time) have a look at the state of the threads on the dampers. If they look to be grotty & horrible & seized give the threads a hose with some WD40 before you get handy with the C spanners.

Thanks once again,

Already got the WD 40 can ready to go as I know the fronts do not have the best looking thread :)

In regards to the Wheel alignment I have just had one done last week [thats what has prompted the action] just wanted to know when I raise the front 10mm will it bring in the camber from -3 to -2 automatically?

Not sure exactly how far it will move...

If you are handy with a calculator you can work it out. Just measure how far the top of the rim is closer to the centreline of the car than the bottom. A bit of basic trig (tan theta equals opposite over adjacent side etc etc) & you have your camber measurement.

Not sure how your toe settings at the front will be affected by the change in ride height as the front links are not parallel like the rears.

Um, it is not about the ATTESSA system.

The R34 GTR has a torque split in the MFD and we did some tests on the car with the wheel arches even and then set correctly and you'd be amazed at the difference in the drive splits for the same circumstances. We couldn't actually get to a 50/50 split with the front end lowered even at launch.

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys,

Have just raised the front up to 355 and the rear to 345 (thanks Sydneykid). Just a quick question - if the wheel alignment was done before the car was raised and the camber was adjusted as far as it could, when I raised it by 10mm would it automatically have reduced the negative camber slightly or should I take it somewhere for further adjustments?

Thanks for ya input.

Scott

well theoretically the more you raise it the less neg camber you will have. BUT raising 10mm may not give a huge difference. regardless, even if you do take it to a wheel allignment place they cant adjust the camber, only measure it for you (unless you get a front camber bush kit, or adjustable upper arms).

Hi Guys,

Have just raised the front up to 355 and the rear to 345 (thanks Sydneykid). Just a quick question - if the wheel alignment was done before the car was raised and the camber was adjusted as far as it could, when I raised it by 10mm would it automatically have reduced the negative camber slightly or should I take it somewhere for further adjustments?

Thanks for ya input.

Scott

Hi Scott, 10 mm, no problem, forget about it, move on.

:rofl: Cheers :ban:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...