Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Woah, now I'm lost.

My point before was that the guy asked if you could still stock ECU features with microtech, then everyone arked up about how shit microtech was, even though it was so not the time.

Why you would get rid of a power fc for a microtech... i'm not so sure on that one....

anyway, i still think i came closest to answering the initial question of how to hook up a microtech so 4ws and shit still works.... lol

are you blind ? my post was the first post and it states that it can be hooked up with the stock computer and it can work.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have a ltx12s on my 1jzgte, i have 1000cc injectors and i dont run a idle air control valve, my car idles at 11.2 11.3 AFRs cold or hot it goes one hit of the key.

my fuel consumption is what you would expect with 1000cc injectors, i have driven a 10.01 sec VL turbo calais with a autronic on it, my car is far nicer at idle at load and at back off, the autronic pops and farts, my microtech doesnt

every ecu is at good as its tuner.

go microtech and get jon or justin at rx engineering to tune it. i think my results speak for themselves.

Shane

I too have a ltx12s in my TT Zed. It only makes 268rwkw @ 15psi, so it's not to crazy.

Dosn't miss a beat, cold starts first up, dash display is informative and ezi to tune.

My mate has one in his Zed and it makes over 400rwkw @ 21psi and it does the job for him.

I have heard that they manage a vee config beter than a straight six, but this is only conjecture. :laugh:

i have a power fc on the car right now , but have problems with it . the car drive great but when it idle it will go up 1000 rpm and drop 800 rpm, if the car rev the rpm drop off fast and the car cut out. cant find the problem,

We use Microtechs on the rotary race cars, wouldn't use anything else.

But NEVER on an RB26, multiple throttle bodies on a turbo charged engine are not their game.

Notice how all the favourable reports from Microtechs on piston engines talk about max power with single throtte bodies. No mention of piss poor closed loop running, wasted spark ignition, difficulty driving individual cylinder CDI, installation time and cost, idle speed control via AAC for electric load, power steering and airconditioning, inacurate base maps etc etc

They simply can not compete on a value for money basis with a $960 buy and $300 tune Power FC.

:( Cheers :(

i am using hks ssq blow off valve ,and how can i check them for leaks

Are they plumbed back or open to atmosphere?

:( cheers D:

PS, the standard GTR BOV's are far better than almost every aftermarket BOV you can buy.

they are open to atmosphere,when i first got the car it was working fine with the hks ssv and one day the car started to cut out

Open to atmosphere BOV's don't work very well with AFM's as the main load sensor. Achieving a consistent and stable return to idle takes lots of tuning, road tuning, you can't duplicate it very easily on the dyno. My recommendation (as always) is to use the standard plumb back BOVs on a GTR.

The problem is very simple, the open to atmosphere BOV's dump a whole lot of air, air that the AFM's have already measured as going into the engine. So the ECU squirts in enough fuel for that amount of air, too much fuel = rich running just as the engine is try to achieve a stable idle. Hence the stalling.

The easiest/cheapest answer is to keep that air within the system, not dump it outside.

Why you think it worked OK for a while and not now is beyond me. Maybe you are driving it more agressively than you were when you first got it. Snapping off the pedal after a wide open throttle, rather than rolling off progressively.

:( cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid

on this topic sydkid

if you dont have a BOV at all and you come off the throttle the air still does come out the front of the turbo.. would it go back out the AFM backwards ?? if it does then will the engine compensate the fuel mixtures for this ?

i have a ltx12s on my 1jzgte, i have 1000cc injectors and i dont run a idle air control valve, my car idles at 11.2 11.3 AFRs cold or hot it goes one hit of the key.

my fuel consumption is what you would expect with 1000cc injectors, i have driven a 10.01 sec VL turbo calais with a autronic on it, my car is far nicer at idle at load and at back off, the autronic pops and farts, my microtech doesnt

every ecu is at good as its tuner.

go microtech and get jon or justin at rx engineering to tune it. i think my results speak for themselves.

Shane

Sots car has a completly different engine to yours and it a single cam rb30. your engine should feel better to drive or there would be something wrong.

Plug the standard computer in and then test compared to a microtech and you will know what we mean.

Sots car has a completly different engine to yours and it a single cam rb30. your engine should feel better to drive or there would be something wrong.

Plug the standard computer in and then test compared to a microtech and you will know what we mean.

sorry effy, i dont agree with any of the comments made about microtechs. i have mates with them on rb 20's rb 25's and they are more than hapy with the fuel consumption and the driveability of them. my car drives just as nice with the mcirotech if not better than it did with the toyota ecu.

the new generation of microtechs are good things and are a lot cheaper than other ecus. i think way to many people base there opinon on old microtechs and bad tuners.

if i can cold start mine with 1000cc injectors at 8 deg for qld jambo first hit of the key thats proof in the pudding. people can rant all they want but i will not be taking my microtech out. infact i am about to sstart using the data logging feature of it as we have reached the limit of what my auto can hold on the dyno and track tuning is the only way we are going to be able to tune it. its a nice problem to have.

Shane

We are mainly talking about a RB26 with quad TB.

I have driven a car for 3 years with a Microtech and even had one running in my skyline for a couple of months.

They dont drive anywhere near as good as a standard computer on the street on cruise or anywhere near as good as a tuned Power FC.

Depends what you want from your car to what ecu you use. If i had my way I would have a Autronic.

sorry effy, i dont agree with any of the comments made about microtechs. i have mates with them on rb 20's rb 25's and they are more than hapy with the fuel consumption and the driveability of them. my car drives just as nice with the mcirotech if not better than it did with the toyota ecu.

I have a question for you.

Have you read this thread, and all the posts within it? Or just posting blindly without actually reading?

Like, seriously... we are talking of RB26 with 6 throttle bodies. Not single TB'ed motors

RB20 - single TB

RB25 - single TB

etc etc.

i have a gtr33 vspec and want to install a microtech ltx12. if install can my 4wd still work , because the 4wd systems has it own computer. and operate from the main computer.

that was the question asked, yes i read it. then i read 5 people flaming microtechs saying they are shit, those comments dont answer old mates question now do they? so your problem is what?

where in the original post does it say anything about 6 throttle bodies or single throttle body.

so really the answers for the last 2 pages should read "yes its possible" and there shouldnt be people people flaming microtechs.

Well RB26 has 6 throttle bodies...................................................

And further on in the thread you will see that the comment about the microtech is due to the car playing up, which is no fault of the PFC already in the car

Well RB26 has 6 throttle bodies...................................................

And further on in the thread you will see that the comment about the microtech is due to the car playing up, which is no fault of the PFC already in the car

i understand a rb26 has 6 throttle bodies, but that want part of the original post which you were having a shot at me about champ. :(

rx engineering are doing a gtr as we speak, so once i know the results from that we will soon now if its a tuning issue or a ecu issues with the 6 throttle bodies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...