Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking for advice on quiet (under 98 Db drive by at full throttle, on track, measured trackside) systems. I have tried a Trust / Greddy Power extreme II which made 102 Db, a doubling of the perceieved noise allowed, so no good at all, and nor is an HKS Hiper Silenced, with a similar noise level. It's the fairly large turbine size I am running, I guess, that's the issue. The exhuast that's on it is a bit ropey, and mild steel. No ID on it, obviously commercially made, but I have never seen one like it before, it came on the car as bought. I need to have a replacement for it soon, and on the new engine about to go in the turbine housing will be bigger, the capacity bigger, and a lot more cam and revs.... Do I need to make a custom system? Do you have noise issues in Oz? How do you meet them without killing too much power?

Thanks.

Holy crap...102db? I have an external gate and i dotn get pinged when at the track, i think they are checkign for 95dB???

What turbo setup are you running? ID be tempted to go twin system, with twin mufflers. You can pack it up nice and tight to the underside, you can the flow benefits of a 4" system and you can share the gasses accross two mufflers

..LOL well the theory sounds good on paper :)

If you wanna make it quiet, twin system is the way to go. All the gains... none of the noise

And its gonna be a custom job and pricey

All the big HP GTR's here in melb are doing it

Twin goes ok into the GTR floorpan aswell.

Not sure on the GTS-t layout, but it couldnt be any worse :)

Im doing the same aswell

I believe they mean from the cat two pipes run towards the rear of the car. So two pipes and two mufflers. I believe if its 2x 2.5" that equals to about one single 4" pipe?

I've considered doing this as well but can't imagine it being too cheap.

Since we're on the topic of exhaust (sorry to OP, don't mean to hijack) is a 3.5" fine for a GTT? Or should I just got 3"? I'm afraid 3.5" might be 'too' big?

siba33 - Twin... wether that be a single dump or twin dumps (single or twin turbo) and then have it twin all the way to the rear.

With a cross-over pipe somewhere along the line.

2 cats (smaller obviously) and then 2 or 4 mufflers somewhere along the system depending on whatever you choose with the exhaust shop etc.

No such thing as "too" big for a turbo car IMO.

You could always get it made out of titanium.

I have a Fujitsubo system. Not sure what it's called but I was at a shop once and there was a car there with it so I said I want that one and they got it for me.

My system is 3" from the turbo back (GTT) and is not restrictive. I have 255rwkw at only 0.9 bar of boost from a highflow turbo so I think that proves it's lack of restriction. 3.5" is just louder if you ask me but in terms of power you can't relly go wrong going bigger.

Anything that's 3.5" or over is a bastard to shut up. In my .sig I have an 100mm exhaust that flows, for sale, but I've

never measured it trackside on full noise. It's 95db @ 3500 no load, (with cats/resonator/muffler)...

On the back of a napkin:

2 x 3" exhausts (ok, 2.82") should flow as much as a single 4"

So if you could find a 3" exhaust configuration that was 95dB on full noise, 2 of them _should be_ 98dB.

Some things to think about:

* are most of your competitors within the 98dB limit? If not, how loud are they on full noise trackside?

* you'll probably only get pinged if you're noticeably louder than other cars in your class or your competitors complain.

* are other car noises (induction/tyre/gearbox/etc) included in the level? If not, how are they eliminated?

* if you're in with a bunch of other cars, there's no way they can measure just you :D

* if you're alone in front, button off past the measuring device

I've heard plenty of racecars that are louder than 98dB (this seems to happen a lot with rotors

and smaller-capacity engines). I've only ever seen one car get chucked off the starting grid

because it was too loud, but I've seen a few get pinged because competitors complained.

There are a few genuine competitors on this forum, might be worth

PMing them for their experiences as threads can sometimes get lost in the noise...

I'd probably try building a twin 3" system, then add muffling till the competitors stop complaining.

Regards,

Saliya

Edited by saliya

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Give it 40psi and send it to the moon
    • I suspect 550s are on the large side for happy operation with a stock/Nistune RB20 ECU. The Hitachi ECU doesn't love short pulse width operation, and the RB20 doesn't need much fuel at idle. Big injectors can be unpleasant. This could be contributing.
    • Yeah, I still don't know why the idle speed control can't catch the falling RPMs. In the Consult logs I see the AAC duty cycle rising, but suddenly it goes lean and the engine stalls. Anyways, the relevance here is the DW 550cc injectors are probably the same. So if OP has similar issues I would be tempted to finger those injectors as problematic for whatever reason vs the ECU failing for some reason.
    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
×
×
  • Create New...