Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Al, your gearing must be different to mine [r34] or something, cause mine was hitting the rev limit at 150km in 3rd gear - no way I could get to 170k / 180k.

edit, oops here is my recent dyno sheet [just to stay on-topic :)]

attachment.php?s=&postid=246025

No the point of the matter is for a 1:1 gear ratio skyline gtsts must be done in 4th gear to acheive an accurate reading.

Dyno in 3rd will give a higher reading and will be less accurate.

Some cars it is better in 3rd gear...and so on

Get your skylines done in 4th gear and not 3rd

Im pushing 286hp but sure as hell i think im pushing more on the road with what i seem to wave goodbye to :) I thought mine was good for about 315@1Bar but not the case :)

How is inaccurate in third? would the power curve be similar in all gears, just maybe more noticable in the third and fourth. As can be seen on the graph mine was done in third gear.

My dyno graph has a couple of flat spots that are noticable. Anyone want to speculate why and if they could have tuned it better or something. Just curious as I didn't notice any flat spots prior to the tune, and now they are very obvious even annoying.

Mike

Mike,

Your A/FR curve on WOT is very very rich in the top end (above 100km/h on the dyno run) :P

I'm fairly sure the Dyno Dynamics A/FR software only reads to 10:1. So the flatline you see from 100km/h & above isn't a true reading. In other words something more like 9:1 A/FR. That's bloody rich! Bad for power, economy, health of engine internals (fuel washing oil off the bores), plug fouling, the list goes on.....

I'm guessing you don't have any form of ECU management. The dips in the power curve look like the factory ECU is pulling timing, & most probably causing the overly rich mixtures as well. You could advance the base timing as a slight work around, at least until you get some control over the ECU.

What mod's does the car have currently? I'm guessing it has FMIC?

Matt

The only mod is a bleed valve set to 9psi. I have been thinking about getting an aftermarket ECU but haven't persued it yet. Need the $$$

I don't want to sound like a cheapskate but a friend of mine had a wrx where he used a bleader on his fuel line?? Or something like that to lean out the mixtures. He warned that it can be dangerous as being too lean is not good, better to be too rich. Is that something to explore? I would only consider it if it can be done properly and not damage the engine, but that said a new ECU would be better by far.

Hehe i guess that is possible Rasi, if you bleed the fuel rail pressure u can lean it out probably very effectively, But the cost of a new engine after u go too lean isnt worth it..

Take your time mate, all skys run rich, but as u boost her up more the fuel pressure rises as well keeping it mega rish and at some stage you will want some fuel management to fix it up and get some power back :)

You can actually buy mechanical fuel pressure bleed kits. See here - http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/mall/fs05.asp However this is very crude (yet effect) way to improve the A/FR's on boost. The system has no feedback. So a conservative approach is best. Mind you, considering your engine is running @ worse than 10:1 up top, there's plenty of room to move!

Much better to try & score a second hand Unichip or S-AFC (~$400-$500).

I'd also get a second opinion on the A/FR's. Just to make sure the dyno info is accurate.

Hi Rasi, the first dip looks like a bit of wastegate creep, what sort of boost controller are you using? You will notice that Dremen's dyno graph shows the same first dip, this is typical and can be tuned out with judicious use of the boost controller and ignition timing (sometimes a little extra fuel helps as well).

The second dip is most likely a combination of the rich air fuel ratios (should be 11.5 or higher) and ignition timing. If you look at Benm's and Dale's dyno graphs the A/F ratio never goes as rich as 10. As you can see correcting the A/F ratio from 11.4 to 1 to 12 to 1 resulted in 13 rwkw more output.

As for the 3rd gear versus 4th gear, it may be to avoid the 180 kph speed limiter or keep the speed down on the dyno. It shows higher torque output but should show the same horsepower.

The question of kph or rpm on the graphs is simply a matter of selecting which you want displayed, provided the operator has hooked up the rpm sensor of course. Ditto, A/F ratios, torque etc

These 4 dyno graphs are a good reason why comparing power output from dyno to dyno and operator to operator is a very inaccurate measure. For example 2 of them indicate "shoot out mode" the other 2 don't.

When we are comparing one car to another on the same dyno (it's a Dyno Dynamics) we always use;

1. the gear that is closest to 1 to 1 (usually 4th)

2. conventional operation (non shootout mode)

3. ramp rate at 100

4. ambient correction at 1.00

5. xtra correction at 1.00

Let's say I am an unscrupulous dyno operator (not saying that any of the four examples are) and I have a customer come in and say something like "I need a better dyno tune, I took my car to XYZ and it only got 140 rwkw. I know, because of the cars that I drag off, it has really got 160 rwkw. They can't be very good, so I came to you cause I have been told that you will get the power." "I've done a few more mods since then and it should be up to 170 rwkw, if you can tune it right."

Now as the operator (and a business man) what am I going to do if I run the car up on the dyno it it has 140 rwkw? Simple I stick a 15% correction factor into it and it shows 161 rwkw. I then tune it and get an extra 10 rwkw, making 171 rwkw on the display.

I give a copy of the printout to my customer and he goes away happy. Now I feel OK, because I really did achieve a 10 rwkw power increase and I have a satisfied customer who will tell all of his friends that my dyno reads right.

The only problem is next time he comes back I have to remember to stick the 15% correction factor back in. Otherwise the power output will be lower, ever had that happen.................

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

The best use of the dyno is to gauge what HP gains you had from a certain mod and to diagnose/tune the car with a aftermarket ecu or a safc. If you use the same dyno everytime you get a good idea of how much HP that mod made. From my signature you can see I'm running around 235HP (or 175kw) at the wheels and I havent done a great deal. Using a electronic boost controller over a bleed valve will give you much better results, but will cost a lot more. Plus with the upped boost you really do need a fmic to keep intake temps down and it should give you a bit more HP as well. When I change my ecu to an autronics and add a dump+front pipe I'll be going back to the same dyno to see what real gains I had from those mods.

if you dont have an aftermarket ecu or a way to control fuel/ignition at given points, what could you actually do to the car on the dyno to "tune" it? (apart from altering base timing)

also, i've seen cars get higher readings by doing multiple power runs (like 3 in 5 mins) with nothing being touched by the mechanic.

this normal? are there really cobwebs in there? :P

Hi Rob, let's try a question. Last time you took your car to the dyno (same one of course), when it made its 235 bhp, it was the middle of winter, say 14 degrees ambient temperature. This time it's the middle of summer and it's 30 degrees.

Now we know that for every 8 degrees of temperature you loose around 5% in horsepower.

Do you want the dyno operator to add 10% ambient correction? ie; the current dyno run shows 220 rwhp without correction but 242 rwhp with correction.

The answer is do you want to know how much horsepower it has today (that's 220) or how much compared to last time after allowing for that fact that it is hotter (that's 242)?

Tough call?

the dyno is a tuning aid (thats one more dollar closer to being a millionaire).

Do the dyno before and after the same day you put a mod on if you can and then you have a very relative guide to the improvement it made....on that day...wearing your lucky watch...and facing into the breeze.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...