Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The main points of nitrogen is that it doesn't leak unless you have a puncture or faulty valve, and the pressure doesn't go up as much with heat.

If I can find a place to do it for $5 a wheel when I buy my new tyres, I will definitely be getting it. Mainly for the convenience of never having to top up my tyres.

JimX,

I think if the tyre shop wants your business, considering your buying new tyres.. ask them will they throw in the nitrogen at no cost. Otherwise, I'm sure someplace else will.

PS: there a lot more profit in tyres than the "I'm only making $10 a tyre a that price"

I got it done on my little Alfa 147.

I used to scrape the driveway badly some days, and not at all on other days.

With nitro in the tyres I never scrape every single day now (it's been 5months on nitro, never needed a top up). So there's proof of consistency as on hot days my tyres would inflate, and thus get into the driveway without scraping, on cold days I would scrape like mad.

Also noticed a gummier feeling all round.

i had a friend fill his tyres with nitrogen on his s2000 before coming to trackday. wether it was done correctly or not i dont know, but he was saying his tyre pressures did fluctuate quite alot with heat. it goes against theory but i had to mention it nonetheless. perhaps the tyres werent fully deflated when refilling with nitrogen? who knows...

on another note, arent plane wheels filled with nitrogen because its non flammable?

i had a friend fill his tyres with nitrogen on his s2000 before coming to trackday. wether it was done correctly or not i dont know, but he was saying his tyre pressures did fluctuate quite alot with heat. it goes against theory but i had to mention it nonetheless. perhaps the tyres werent fully deflated when refilling with nitrogen? who knows...

on another note, arent plane wheels filled with nitrogen because its non flammable?

franks,

Sort of "Off the topic", but I thought honda had a semi recall on the S2000, because the cars wouldn't handl correctly. If I recall correctly, Apparantley the only tyre that correctly fits the S2000 is a particular Bridgstone S02??

franks,

Sort of "Off the topic", but I thought honda had a semi recall on the S2000, because the cars wouldn't handl correctly. If I recall correctly, Apparantley the only tyre that correctly fits the S2000 is a particular Bridgstone S02??

would be quite an agreement between honda and bridgestone if that was the case wouldnt it be??? :) i heard something similar to that but i can't qualify it ;)

jimx, ...... daymn!

After a couple of track days you would know what to set your cold/hot pressure to for best grip/handling. Nitrogen tyres still change pressure just claim not as much. You will still find that tyre temperature and track temperature and track surface quality will make differences to how your car goes around the circuit anyway.

The main benefits would be if nitrogen is more consistent, and keeps your tyres cooler. Some people say this is noticeable, others say it's not. Might be worth experimenting in if you're really keen on getting that last bit out of your car but I'm sure other upgrades make a bigger difference to confidence and lap times.

I believe they use nitrogen in aircraft tires. Prolly because they dont expand like air and the pressure in the tires stays constant.

MoonButt

Just on a side note. All high altitude planes use nitrogen. The reason is that pure nitrogen has no water. If normal air is used, once the aircraft gets up to altitude where the temp is well below freezing the water vapor could condense and freeze inside the tyre. This is not a problem until the plane lands and the out of balance wheel can cause lots of trouble.

90% of light aircraft use normal air.

As far as nitrogen not leaking. I find this hard to believe. If it were true then you could put normal air in your tyre and all the other gasses will leak out leaving the nitrogen behind :)

I work on several aircraft that use nitrogen in their tyres and they still need topping up on occasion.

On the other hand using nitrogen does have its advantages (all being mentioned previously).

If a place offered to put nitrogen in for free they yes go ahead, if you had to pay. I personally would not bother.

As far as nitrogen not leaking.  I find this hard to believe.  If it were true then you could put normal air in your tyre and all the other gasses will leak out leaving the nitrogen behind  :)  

I work on several aircraft that use nitrogen in their tyres and they still need topping up on occasion.

When they put nitrogen in, they take all the air and water vapour out. The reason why normal tyres leak a bit of air is they cause tiny spots of rust around the valve which causes it to leak. Once you put the nitrogen in there is no water vapour to cause the valves to rust so the valve holds better.

Sure it's not 100% airtight but it's a vast improvement.

air is 78% nitrogen , 21% Oxygen and 1% other stuff.

Per mole, Nitrogen weighs 28grams, Air weighs about 29Grams per mole.

One mole of gas at SLC is 24.5Litres.

Short answer, it dont make much difference. just wasting 5 dollars on each tire "making u think its better" :)

bro, phisics and chemistry suggests that there is no reason for there to be a vast improvement in the handling on your car, due to the fact you inflated your  tyres with nitrogen gas.

Air is 80% nitrogen...

I don't ever recall being told that it would vastly improve the handling in my car. It wasn't mentioned by anyone in this thread and I've never heard anyone else say it.

The main points of it were to slow or stop leakage from the tyres, and to improve consistency of tyre pressure over a wider temperature range. Personally I'd do it primarily for the former reason because I'm a lazy bastard. $20 to not have to bother checking my tyre pressures every week, sign me up.

The water vapour in normal air is also not good for the lining of your tyres (something else fixed by nitrogen), but we usually go through a set before this matters anyway.

I am no scientist but I am sure air is something like 60-70% nitrogen, 20-25% oxygen, plus other crap.

I actually am a scientist! haha I hate that description, it's a tossy term but true :)

As far as I'm aware it's not the fact that it's Nitrogen..it's the fact it's DRY nitrogen....compressed air is always heavily loaded with moisture. When your tyres heat up the water vapour expands much more greatly than the air inside.

Guy with compressors, just check your water trap whenever you use it, tons of the stuff!

This is what causes the fluctuations...for a race track DRY Nitrogen is way worth it as your tyres will heat up a fair bit...but for your everyday jaunt to Coles, the tyre companies are just ripping-off Joe Blo.

The reason they choose Nitrogen and not Helium or Argon, Neon etc...is the plain fact it's cheap and doesn't bleed out of the tyre as easily as other inert gasses.

Oxygen is also cheap, but let's face it who wants a hot tyre full of Oxygen near all those rubber fumes...whoompa a bright white flash as your tyres spontaneously combust!

Anyway that was my 2 cents ;)

Dan

oxygen is a hazardous chemical just like hydrogen. 100% oxygen will make things that don't burn easily, burn easily.

I was under the impression that compressed air wouldn't have as much water content as normal, but maybe not. I would say the benefit of having dry air would outweigh pure nitrogen. Sucking normal air through a dessicant prior to compressing would probably do the same thing.

on another note, arent plane wheels filled with nitrogen because its non flammable?

It's used because it doesn't expand much when heated. A normal aircraft will land at around 150-200mph and then brake quite hard which causes a hell of a lot of heat near the tyres which won't expand if filled with nitrogen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...