Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a JMS dump, it is pretty sweet and is a direct replacement for the stocker - don't have to rotate the front pipe like the arrow diffs ones... but if you are having a front pipe made up it doesn't make a difference.

Also, Daalder Exhaust in Box Hill have some dumps for R33s coming from overseas - ring them and ask them how long and how much - talk to matthew. They also have sweet sweet Pacemaker coated front pipes for like 220 fitted.

Thanks meggala! The website's looking good! Keep it up :D

Thanks for the tip ronin, I'll give them a call. I don't suppose anyone has a GTech so I can do some before and after 0-100's etc for the fitting of the dump/front pipe?

Benm did a great review however the dyno graphs don't have a 'time' axis so the true gain isn't displayed.

Originally posted by Ronin 09

Also, Daalder Exhaust in Box Hill have some dumps for R33s coming from overseas - ring them and ask them how long and how much - talk to matthew. They also have sweet sweet Pacemaker coated front pipes for like 220 fitted.

Thanks for the tip! I gave them a call, and they'll fit a mild steel coated front pipe for $190! They also have stainless dump pipes for $350, but no 'combo' pipes.

Should I bother with a dump pipe for the stock turbo or spend more time searching around for one of these combo pipes? Unless I blow it up I won't be changing my turbo, and I really don't see myself spending $350 on a dump.

The guy from Daalder seemed to indicate most of the benefit is seen in the front pipe upgrade, and Nizpro advised a friends 200sx to not bother about one for the stock SR20DET turbo. Is this the case on a Skyline?

He also mentioned better response, acceleration and a 1-2psi natural boost increase :headspin:

Ok, before I'm about to lose my job from spending too much time at work on personal calls - I've narrowed my options to the ones below:

1. Just a front pipe, mild steel, coated and fitted in about 30 mins from Daalder exhaust in Box Hill - $190

2. Mail order a mild steel combo dump pipe from UAS or flyn.com.au - $320 and then pay someone here to fit it

3. Custom made stainless front+dump pipe fitted from Nizpro in Bayswater - $385 (would take a day to make + fit it).

I think I'll go with option 3 - thank you all for your opinions. A friend from work (BlueTwo on these forums) had his exhaust made by them at it seems pretty nice.

Just can't justify spending ~$350 on a Jap brand dump and then ~$250 for a Jap brand front pipe - sorry meggala! (I can't wait for the 'I told you so' when it starts to rattle and bump around!).

I had just the front pipe and cat back for a while, and my boost moved up about 2 psi everywhere; peaked at like 9.9 or so...

Any of the options above sound good, you can't really go wrong for 385 fitted stainless. you'll be really happy with any of these choices.

Great - that sort of boost level would suit me just fine (with the stock IC). And I wouldn't have to worry about installing a bleed valve and having it spiking etc I imagine. It's all booked in for next Wednesday...the anticipation...:looney:

I thought that it was much more responsive and the top end was definitely stronger. When you get the factory dump off, have a look at where the wastegate dumps to... it is basically a solid bit of metal about 5mm behind the wastegate. Don't get me wrong, while some people say that it is worse with the dump, simple fluid flow theory tells me that the lesser the restriction, the better.

I think Benm posted a thread with before/after dump and front pipe dyno figures, i think this is a pretty good indication of an increase.

Remember that all i have is a 3" dump / front pipe, a 'race' cat that flares out into a 4" Trust cat back, and a pod filter. I have 174rwkW, which i think is pretty good... Who is doing the exhaust system for you? Nizpro? I'd love to see / hear it when it is done. Below are links to pics of my system.

Yep, getting Nizpro to do the work. My thoughts exactly on the dump pipe. I've got 148rwkw (on a 4WD dyno dynamics - the one at Frankston Tafe, but of course, each dyno is different) with only a pod + 3.5" HKS cat back (done nothing the boost - only other mods are suspension related).

With the extra flow and natural boost rise, I'm very interested to see the results on the same dyno. I know people with FMIC's and cat backs that really don't get that much more on the same dyno.

Then I can check out my A/F's as well to see if a S-AFC II is my next mod (or EBC or Flywheel) - obviously I'm a subscriber two rev210's theories. Which reminds me, I better get my ass into gear and built that cold air partition.

Where are those links (of your exhaust)???

Off the topic, but my mate got defected in a 300ZX TT tonight; too low, bald rears and no number plate lights. What interested me more was that he passed the EPA random test 10m down the road after the breath test. They were on doncaster road near westfield. What worries me now is that if i get random EPA tested, will my car pass the emissions test...? Remember it has a 'race cat' (read no cat) but i think my mate has gutted cats... SO in summation, can the car still pass emssions without the cat?

EDIT - started a new thread

Originally posted by Ronin 09

I thought that it was much more responsive and the top end was definitely stronger. When you get the factory dump off, have a look at where the wastegate dumps to... it is basically a solid bit of metal about 5mm behind the wastegate. Don't get me wrong, while some people say that it is worse with the dump, simple fluid flow theory tells me that the lesser the restriction, the better.

Well, f**k! Just rang Nizpro to confirm my exhaust fitment tomorrow, and he said its just a front pipe! Front pipe for $385 - forget it! Now I've just wasted a week waiting for them. He also swears that the dump pipe doesn't do anything whatsoever, and is not a reliable piece once an aftermarket one is fitted. This completely contradicts what the guys at UAS say, they said even on the stock turbo you'd be suprised the difference it can make... :argue:

Doh - now back to me being confused again... hmm maybe a 30 min fit by Daadler is the way to go - 190 for the front pipe in mild coated...? Not sure...

Matt from Daalder rang me the other day about where i got the dump; was that for you, McCracken? Sorry to hear about your stuff around, it'll all work out and be sweet. You will notice the difference. I went down the Great ocean road yesterday, and the midrange improvement was awesome. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...