Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i got over 200kw with stock ecu and turbo. there are people with only about 180kw with pfc. just goes to show that a poorly tuned ecu is worse then a stock ecu that is pulling its weight.

just remember dyno to dyno and also the health of the motor :D

but yes a poorly tuned computer is a bad thing

I'm no expert but surely a standard computer running high boost etc, to approx 200rwkw is not going to be as good as an aftermarket programmable ecu.

Sure the car might make 200rwkw but on what dyno? If the same car for eg had a PFC put in and tuned (on the same dyno) then it might only make about 200rwkw aswell. BUT I'm pretty sure that an adjustment on the standard fuel settings alone will give you an improvement in low-midrange power which would be quite significant. It isn't all about the peak figure is it? its the area under the power line i think that makes the diff.

This would make a SAFC 2 or similar worth installing wouldn't it? but then if you save a few extra $ then you get a pfc, you still have to tune both it's pretty much the diff in cost of the pfc or safc.

I have heard the Blitz sbc boost controllers are probably the best followed by the HKS one, this is what I have heard (not experienced), is this what others think? The apexi boost controllers aren't supposed to be very good .

Is a Nismo or Tomei fuel pump a better option than the bosch (in tank setup)? does anyone have trouble with the pump picking fuel up when the tank is below 1/4 fuel? The nismo and tomei are just a direct replacement item and should be exactly the same as standard, only with a higher pressure capability.

If anyone disagrees with me then thats cool, back it up though and give me (us all) some reasons and I'll gladly accept it, I'm open to suggestion an here to learn.

Good luck with the mods Quinny

go to the dyno section and have a look at my graph. it is smooth most of the way up, especially down low. its smoother than paulr33's graph and he has a pfc. there is 2 dips where it leaned out a touch, but if it was right it would've been a dead smooth graph. and my torque curve shows it is even too.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...ic=55845&st=160 about 3rd one down.

Edited by mad082

I believe he is refering to yours Paulr33,

----------

So pauls appears to have a problem with the top end reading flat then...

Compare it to something else..

Maybe this one I've attached that obviously doesn't have something strange going on with a flat top end.

Comparing dyno's is silly unless its on the same day same dyno, same fuel, same operator same person tying the car down.

post-382-1150285762.jpg

what mods on the car on that dyno. just power fc? i'm below it all the way. but that has obviously tuned well. the point i'm trying to make is that a poorly tuned pfc will be worse than a good stock ecu. bigger isn't always better.

This is what I was meaning really, there not too much point in saying a car gets this or that many rwkw's unless its comparable. One car could read 40-50kw different on different dynos.

On a different note.. Mad, I would be interested to see a dyno graph of yours with the boost or preferrably the AFR's on it. Would like to know what the computer is doing to the afrs to get such a power figure.

Have you ever been under the impression that your stock ecu has been chipped/ flashed?

Are you running splitfires to cope with your increased boost or are the stockies holding in there for now?

oh yeah he is comparing it to mine, right. the graph you are looking at is outdated, the tune is far from a poor tune i have spent a few hours tuning it and so to have some workshops in melbourne.

also if you are on stock ecu and stock turbo then you would be encountering the rich and retard protection well before you made any decent power

so you have piggybacked, clamped afm or remapped

stock coilpacks, ecu is stock, but has run a piggy back in the past as the wires have been spliced. we just did some 'tinkering' to get more power. any mechanic with half a brain could tell you to do.

wanted to get afr's but they wouldn't give them to me. all they said was that they could be improved a little. it is still running full stock fuel system. it was leaning out a little up top, thats what the dips are. its where they lifted off the throttle a bit till it richened up a bit.

so have you avoided the stock airflow protection ?

just saw 2nd post so you run just underneath it then. sure

so what are you trying to say

the powerfc is shit cos you make more max power ?

how are the IGN points tuned?

how are the cruise AFR's tuned ?

no i'm saying your tune is crap cause it dies at 6000rpm, whereas mine keeps making power till redline. and i'm saying that a stock ecu that is running well will make nearly as much power as a well tuned pfc on the same car, provided it is below the boost cut.

i know you can make over 200kw with the stock ecu, its nothing knew i am just curious as a stock stock ecu wont make that amount of power, it will encounter rich and retard protection. and usually if you bypass that it will still plummet to mega rich land somewhere near 10 afr's so your power goes out the window. the only way to bring it back into line near 12 is to piggyback fuel computer, trick/hack the afm or clamp it's signal.

a piggyback fuel computer can clamp or keep limiting the afm signal to get around the excess protection. its not actually boost cut at all its excess airflow. nothing to do with boost

well what did you expect to happen? do you expect the powerfc would make double the max power? of course it wont. why would it? airflow makes power not ecu code or logic. sure it will most likely make more power, but certainly not double or triple. i think people just assume if you have a powerfc it should be at least 220rwkw as most can make near 180rwkw on stock ecu.

and yes my max power dies off, i have known this for some time now. my rb25 has 150,000k's on it. how many does yours have

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...