Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is there a problem with having boost in the chamber and no fuel? is it the same effect as leaning out or is it safe, as most aftermarket computers seem to use this function.

Just wondering, as my car can spend a bit of time bouncing on the rev limiter and my EMS only has a fuel cut function.

Apparently yes fuel cut can cause leaning out whilst banging the limiter. My theory is that as you're basically switching on and off the injectors whilst the engine is still breathing all the air in. So for example some piston intake cycles may not get the right amount of fuel it needs as the injector might only be active half way thru the intake cycle. Kinda hard to explain my theory. Ignition cut IMO is alot better.

Edited by Busky2k

Turning the fuel totally off to a cylinder doesn’t not cause lean running in that cylinder. No fuel = no combustion, therefore there is no running for it to be lean. Remember we are talking maximum rpm here. In the unlikely event that there is any fuel left over from one cycle, it will be consumed in the nest cycle. One cycle of combustion of a miniscule amount of fuel will not damage anything.

:D cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid
Nah what I mean SK is if the fuel injector is switched off 3/4 the way through an intake cycle.. then... its lean for that cycle!

One cycle is not going to do anything.

Think about it, you snap off the throttle every gearchange.

The injector duty cycle goes to zero while you change gear

Until you get back on the throttle

What's the difference?

:rofl: cheers :ban:

Edited by Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...