Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yepo, goin 1.5 up back and 1 way up front, gotta open the rear one up anyway caus the seals leaking

bushes are leaking :D replacing the subframe ones with alloy ones, and the rest with the whiteline ones, getting it all from sydneykid

plus i'll need replace the diff's sometime, as i dont think they'll last too long with 750bhp and many limiter launches :teehee:

LIMITER LAUNCHES FTW.. i havent tried anything above 5 on my gtr. lol. and 5 was in the wet lol.. fun times.. the 180 just sits the smoking lol.. yay for RWD...

uh im pretty sure the GTR come with a mechanical rear as standard and can take a fair lot of power.. but then agian ur shane and u break all cars u drive..

i had 2 cracking subframe bushes and u called my car a rooted POS lol.. sounds like ur garden ornament has seen better days lol..

and u r dodgy lol.. i etched my name with an angle grinder into a R32 GTST front guard lol.. it was rooted anyway.. and ive modified a coolant pressure cap with a angle grinder too!...

LIMITER LAUNCHES FTW.. i havent tried anything above 5 on my gtr. lol. and 5 was in the wet lol.. fun times.. the 180 just sits the smoking lol.. yay for RWD...

uh im pretty sure the GTR come with a mechanical rear as standard and can take a fair lot of power.. but then agian ur shane and u break all cars u drive..

i had 2 cracking subframe bushes and u called my car a rooted POS lol.. sounds like ur garden ornament has seen better days lol..

and u r dodgy lol.. i etched my name with an angle grinder into a R32 GTST front guard lol.. it was rooted anyway.. and ive modified a coolant pressure cap with a angle grinder too!...

i'm sure the diffs woudla been awesome when new, but ur forgetting these cars are now coming on 18 years old, and with what i'm planning to do with the car, i'd rather replace shit now, then have it break on me and fix it then.

yeah looking over it with shit removed, it has certainly seen better days, but most parts gotta be changed anyway, so it dont really bother me, it comes with the territory.

it's gonna be awesome when it's finished, but i'll always be broke :teehee:

i reckon most of the pics in this thread are from me and car crap lol

i'll upload some more when this head arrives! should be here in the next day or so! :teehee:

I reckon this thread needs more pics of me

Hair needs another inch untill I get my fringe cut back in :laughing-smiley-014:

on this shoulder.. wtf.. someone care to elaborate?

i had my right one reconstructed when i was in yr 12 (3 yrs ago) and it's been playing up recently i.e making squeaking noises, pinching and feeling like its gonna pop out again

so gotta get it checked out and maybe even operated on again :huh:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...