Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cant fit the tank in the boot without cutting the boot floor. The tank is 22" tall (3gal) and theres only a max of 20.5" from the base of the wheel well. However the std fuel tank runs right up underneath where the wheel well is, so theres no simple cut and shut way to do it :P

cant fit the tank in the boot without cutting the boot floor

ill be round soon with the 9 inch, i love cutting shit up. You should have seen my mates drop top datto ute after i got to it with a angle grinder.

ill be round soon with the 9 inch, i love cutting shit up. You should have seen my mates drop top datto ute after i got to it with a angle grinder.

haha yeh i love my 9 inch too, gets alot of use at my place lol

the thing is, y need to run a fuel cell to fit the dry sump tank in the boot in a 32. 33 boots are deep enough u can put the tank anywhere

haha yeh i love my 9 inch too, gets alot of use at my place lol

the thing is, y need to run a fuel cell to fit the dry sump tank in the boot in a 32. 33 boots are deep enough u can put the tank anywhere

your gtr is neva gonna be finished

wanna put ur money where ur mouth is?

im sticking to my guns that it'll be ready early december :P

awesome if you get it done in time

but why rush it now its not like you want to cut any corners on the final stages.

Who are you going to be using for tuning??

awesome if you get it done in time

but why rush it now its not like you want to cut any corners on the final stages.

Who are you going to be using for tuning??

heh, im not cutting corners, i've budgeted it out and it's come up as early december being the completion date

that's a tough one. Prolly mark from godzilla, seeing as he tune's his and theo's cars, and im going drag racing, so it seems the logical one. Also i need advice on suspension setup and diff's, and he'd know.

quick around circuits. how many drag car's have they setup?

personally, i didnt like the reception i got when i asked them what they knew about a crank trigger disk setup with the autronic.

my ultimate goal with this car is a 9, but that's not gonna happen for a year or 2 i reckon, main issue being the box

quick around circuits. how many drag car's have they setup?

personally, i didnt like the reception i got when i asked them what they knew about a crank trigger disk setup with the autronic.

my ultimate goal with this car is a 9, but that's not gonna happen for a year or 2 i reckon, main issue being the box

doesnt giant do a low 10 in circut setup, im sure they would know a fairbit about setting a car up to quick at the drags.

yeh they've run a 10.2, but i wouldnt get the support at a test session with cnj as i could with godzilla.

dunno, theres still a few months before it comes time to pick, so we'll see

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...