Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah i think this was annouced a few months ago for memory

Good news for the rich

Bad news for me

Just can't wait to see one on the road

i think its still good news for us cause its bound to push R34 GTR prices down further when a car is the last model of that series it hold a better price

no not concept and there is a article here i couldnt be bothered posting about it b4 in light of the weekends events

http://carsguide.news.com.au/story/0,20384...6-21822,00.html

early 2008, only 1.5 years, not that long to save!! my R34 is not going to be worth much by then... hopefully whatever job i have can pick up the slack :P

$150K i think would be the cheap side, i think more $170,000 - it's going to be too much car to go for $150K - i guess they'll try and stick to $150 as much as they can, get's a little "pyschological factor" above that amount.

997 Turbo is $330K+, if this car comes in anywhere under say $175k and can compete with the 997... it will be THE bargain performance car... but i guess they're going to run into the same problem of people justifying $150K+ for a Nissan. $150K would be nice i reckon and would be probably snagg the BFYB title if they could keep it there.

can't wait! I know someone down at the golf club will get one! There's one of eveything else down there :mad:

hmm....if its in the same price range as those ones - i say GIDDY UP!!!!

but i doubt it, its a car in with the likes of porsche and ferrari now.....150,000 is a realistic figure...though im not sure what to think of the 7spd sequential :ermm:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...