Jump to content
SAU Community

Tomei Poncam 256/8.5mm Camshafts (s2 R33)


Recommended Posts

Bought these 2 weeks ago, but selling them due to a change of plans.

The camshafts are brand new, still in the boxes and plastic. They are for the Series 2 RB25DET R33 Skylines or Stageas.

Part numbers for the cams are:

143050

IN 1415 256085

EX 1426 256085

They are 256 degrees duration and retain the standard 8.5mm lift.

For more information on Poncams, the Tomei website

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...shaft_rset.html

These cams are designed to be a DIRECT replacement to the standard cams, retaining the stock lifters.

I am asking $780 + delivery. These are brand new guys!

Edited by SPOOLN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because thats what I was told when I bought them. If you know different could you please tell us SK.

The inlet camshaft part numbers are the same for S1 and S2, but the exhaust camshaft numbers are different. This would indicate it may well be a difference between the CAS drives. The cylinder head castings, buckets, followers, valves, collets etc are definitely the same, so it can’t be anything associated with that.

So the question is, are the S1 and S2 CAS’s different?

Then is S1.5 the same as S1 or S2?

:( cheers :woot:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...