Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, Ive been looking at several intercooler kits for my gtst. The cheaper ones come with 2.5 inch piping but the more expensive ones come with 3. Is it really worth spending the extra few hundred and get the 3" piping? I mean i know that the larger diameter will flow better, but is it going to make a difference that will justify spending more money?

Come to think about it, anyone know the throttle body diameter for an RB25det off the top of their heads?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/120301-intercooler-piping-diameter/
Share on other sites

2.5" piping is more then enough... it will keep turbo lag to a minimum as well as give you an even flow with your stock intake pipe...

The FMIC core flow is what will cool the air and give you best perfoemance... Have a look at the Gktech FMIC kit in the group buy section...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=120149

Best value for money!

Cheers

while were on the subject of throttle bodies... :D

1. would going slightly larger be an advantage for rb25det ???

2. and wat size would u recommend :santa: ?

1. No, not until you are well and truly past the limit of the standard internals

2. See #1

:D cheers :D

T/body diameter should be the same for both.

There is no point going to 3 inch pipe work unless you are doing a major upgrade and seeking more than 400hp at the wheels. There is also no point upgrading the pipework if you are running standard cams as your hp limit will be around 230-240rwkw anyway and the 2 1/2 inch piping is more than capable of handling up to 300rwkw and over. The outlet on the turbo should only be around 2 - 2 1/4 inch as well so adjusting for some expansion would take you to the optimum diameter of 2.5

Similar type questions...

1. Does the 'fatness' of the cooler make a lot of difference...?? Ive seen them from say 65mm thick to 100mm?

2. Is the cooler only as effective as the the surface area exposed to the rush of air... (ie is the area of intercooler blocked by the front bar useless?)

Because I was thinking of just getting a cooler that wasn't as 'tall' as the usual 300mm and going for something half as tall.

the thickness of the cooler only really adds to lag unless u got mega horsepower, id say nething more than 75mm thickness is a waste for up to 20psi..

and yes a coola behind a bumper will not be as affective as a cooler with direct air flow... ie, is the reason u mite see ppl cutting up there stock bumper to expose more of the coola..

one thing i always thort but, wouldnt with beta flow ud achieve more horsepower?... like thru 3" at 15psi wouldnt the flow produce slightly more hp than the flow from 2.5" ??.. or does the 2.5" act in no way restrictive?

Edited by BiRDY

You loose airspeed with the larger pipe. it bottle necks when it reduces back down at the throttle body, and the larger area means more area to fill so can slightly increase lag. Your pipework should be the same size as your turbo outlet & throttle body. No step ups or reductions, just nice and smooth flow. in saying that the lag problem is easily sorted out if the pipework is shorter. If it is one of those cheap kits where the pipework runs up behind the radiator and then around into the throttle body, then no matter what pipe diameter, you have a large area to fill due to the pipe length, therfore increase in lag, and also heatsoke in the cooler pipe.

SMIC is more efficient but doesnt have the rice factor. There are kits where the cooler inlet and outlet are on the same side, this keeps the pipework shorter and cooler, therefore giving you a cooler charge even when you push a larger volume of air through at higher boost pressures. Do yourself a favour and spend the extra money on a kit that has been designed correctly.

the thickness of the cooler only really adds to lag unless u got mega horsepower, id say nething more than 75mm thickness is a waste for up to 20psi..

and yes a coola behind a bumper will not be as affective as a cooler with direct air flow... ie, is the reason u mite see ppl cutting up there stock bumper to expose more of the coola..

one thing i always thort but, wouldnt with beta flow ud achieve more horsepower?... like thru 3" at 15psi wouldnt the flow produce slightly more hp than the flow from 2.5" ??.. or does the 2.5" act in no way restrictive?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
    • For race cars, this is one part where I find having the roll cage bar having gone through a hole in the floor better than the build it up on a ledge inside... The Merc I help on, the main hoop ends are marked on the car, and the jack is marked... Jack goes under a few inches and lifts one whole side of the car up... Removes that fight for long slim jacks for race car duties!   My biggest issue for the daily drivers I work on, is my jacks don't go high enough. The jacks start out on a few blocks, jack it up, then start a second jack under it on more blocks, and then I can get an axle stand under it. My axle stands are presently in use, and are nearly fully extended. The car is sitting with barely more than a cm of clearance to get the wheel off the studs! Sarah's Kluger is the same, as it has an ungodly amount of droop available in the suspension and a distinct lack of good jacking points!
    • Happy? Yep, my to do list is getting shorter and shorter. Either this light approaching is the end of the tunnel, or I'm about to be hit by a train... Ha ha ha   Also, Duncan isn't that far out of town that you need to make a multi day drive out of it. 😛
    • Sorry I meant that we are building the EH for a client.
    • LOL, when one "money pit" is never enough Noice, and excellent work mate
×
×
  • Create New...