Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive just bought a 700hp rated turbo for my r33. its a garrett 3582R or sumthing along those lines. it isnt a 3540 i know that for sure. But i need to replace the factory ECU before i put it in. What one would be suitable for my RB25 ?? At this stage, all it will have is the bigger turbo, a front mount, and what ever ECU i choose. I will run it at about 16pound to be safe. Ive been told to buy a wolf 3D plug in for $1600. Any other suggestions ????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It all depends on what you plan to with the car in the future...thats a fairly large turbo...what other mods have you got to support it ie, injectors, fuel pump etc... Power fc is probably the best if your going to get your best performance with mods however if your just going to have a couple of light mods fmic bov zoorst etc then maybe get a piggyback..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238517
Share on other sites

its a 97 m spec strait off the ship from jap, ive put a 3" zorst (from cat back i think), boost control, trust BOV, HKS air pod.. at the moment all i want is more power and boost, in future ill go manifold, external wastegate, injectors, fuel pump, but right now all i want is to put my turbo on with a good computer to run it. and ill put a front mount on aswell. i want a hand controller aswell.. do u recon apexi power fc will do the trick and back up later down the track when i put the other mods on ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238541
Share on other sites

Yes power fc is your best bet mate as it is very tunable and can be tuned again at a later date when you plan to do more upgrades. If you like i can get you a price on one? As for tuning costs it all depends on where you go!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238561
Share on other sites

im not very experienced with turbo cars, this is my 1st import. i was told it was a good turbo. how much boost could i run safely with that turbo without doing the internals or putting a larger fuel pump and injectors in?? I want to put those extra mods on later down the track when i save up a little more. Will it be alot quicker than a stocko skyline if i put the turbo, power fc, and a front mount on or wont it make much difference???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238608
Share on other sites

a well setup skyline on the stock turbo would blow away your car with a pfc that turbo and an intercooler

average power makes a car fast

not a big turbo. its a good turbo? based on what? what do you want out of the turbo? do you want lag? do you want quick response? do you want max power? do you want a good street car? do you want to win dyno comps and nothing else?

what do you want to do with the car? what do you expect?

only then can someone say its a good or bad turbocharger or recommend one that is suitable. also a power goal will give you the answer you need

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238678
Share on other sites

700hp turbo running 16psi/pounds is alot of power my guess is you'll be making power around 230rwkw-300rwkw.

BUT your biggest problems is you don't have supporting mods to run that kind of power with your current setup.

My guess guys correct me if i'm wrong

Stock Fuel Pump (good for 200rwkw?)

Stock Injectors (good for 220rwkw?)

if i were in your shoes get the fuel pump and injectors done or else your engine will go BOOM! running 16psi on a 700hp turbo on stock fuel pump and injectors NOT a good idea.

OR if your really tight for funds get the front mount on, get the turbo on and RUN the lowest possible boost setting in the meantime until you can afford a fuel pump/injectors/metal head gasket. aim to tune the car for around the 200rwkw mark.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238696
Share on other sites

correct the powerfc is a great computer but with stock injectors and stock pump it wont be a safe tune. youll need;

larger injectors

larger airflow meter

larger fuel pump

heavy duty clutch

some good tyres

cold air intake

suitable manifold (and gate if external)

suitable dump pipe

suitable 3" turbo back exhaust at the least (with hiflow cat)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2238822
Share on other sites

My guess guys correct me if i'm wrong

Stock Fuel Pump (good for 200rwkw?)

Stock Injectors (good for 220rwkw?)

ive got stock injectors and fuel pump, atm im on 232rwkw with aftermarket turbo.. he would be able to get around 240-250rwkw before maxing out the fuel pump, injectors can go a bit more maybe 260rwkw..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2240014
Share on other sites

700hp turbo running 16psi/pounds is alot of power my guess is you'll be making power around 230rwkw-300rwkw.

BUT your biggest problems is you don't have supporting mods to run that kind of power with your current setup.

My guess guys correct me if i'm wrong

Stock Fuel Pump (good for 200rwkw?)

Stock Injectors (good for 220rwkw?)

if i were in your shoes get the fuel pump and injectors done or else your engine will go BOOM! running 16psi on a 700hp turbo on stock fuel pump and injectors NOT a good idea.

OR if your really tight for funds get the front mount on, get the turbo on and RUN the lowest possible boost setting in the meantime until you can afford a fuel pump/injectors/metal head gasket. aim to tune the car for around the 200rwkw mark.

stock inj are good for 230-240

stock AFM maxes at near 210

Cams at 235

16psi boost on that turbo with computer, cams, AFM and inj upgrade will get you 320rwkw.

Without upgrading any of these things will cause the Boom you speak of. This should be interesting to watch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2240584
Share on other sites

whilst its all good and fun to have 320rwkw on

ecu

cams

afm

injectors

what about the important stuff that makes it driveable?

whats the point of all that power will crappy tyres, stock suspension, stock clutch and other various components that help make the turbo upgrade worthwhile. a lot of people these days are into the habit of just grabbing any old cheap ebay turbo or garrett reseller $xyz$ and then bolting it and fitting mods (only bare essentials)

to me, i dont see the point, it would suck and be frustrating

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121435-turbo-upgrade/#findComment-2240717
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...