Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

was just looking at an RB26 converted GTt, and i think the engine is from a 32, notorius for havin trouble with the oil pump drive, and i believe it has been rebuilt at some stage (so my guess is its from a 32) but was just wandering what visual differences to look out for?

PS - anyone remember what issue of HPI/ZOOM had the in depth article about the differences in each model? not the GT-R special 5, thats lookin at the cars, im just interested in the article about engines.

edit - i just took a closer look, and it would appear it was an NA auto before it was converted. what are the major differences between the NA and turbo, apart from engine and gearbox.

brakes?

suspension?

diff? im assuming single spinner

what else?

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121847-differences-between-32-and-33-rb26/
Share on other sites

Engine number will help.

thats the thing we dont no anything about the car apart form pics.

Is this ADDICTED2R34S' car?

nope....didnt even no his gtt was a rb26 :devil:

also....what kind of problems of things u can think of that might have a bit of a hassle running with a car thats been converted from a NA auto to a Twin turbo Manual?

Edited by anjoO
thats the thing we dont no anything about the car apart form pics.

nope....didnt even no his gtt was a rb26 :devil:

also....what kind of problems of things u can think of that might have a bit of a hassle running with a car thats been converted from a NA auto to a Twin turbo Manual?

brakes

diff

dash cluster wont have boost gauge

how are they brakes and diff different?

boost gauge isnt a biggy....

brakes will be tiny because they are NA brakes (unless they have been changed)

IIRC, diff would be an open diff im pretty sure the vlsd only came on the turbo model

brakes will be tiny because they are NA brakes (unless they have been changed)

IIRC, diff would be an open diff im pretty sure the vlsd only came on the turbo model

do u think its a good idea to buy a GTT NA Auto converted into a rb26 manual twin turbo? or will it cause to many hassles in the long run?

there is no way a RB26 converted non-turbo would pass registration with the NA brakes...

and even if it's dodgy and gets registered - the first time a cop who knows what he's looking at will take you to the cleaners

no I don't think it's a good idea to touch anything RB26 seeing your recent unfortunate writing off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...