Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

i dont know if this is the right section to post this but yea...

durring the week when i was driving to work in my R32 gts-t i got pulled over from the cops. (i wasnt doin anything bad and my car is completely stock part from the cat back Exhaust.) anyways they were lookin over my car trying to pin sumthing on me. anyways they said my Exhaust is to loud and ill have to goto the EPA to get it tested etc..

my question is if i put my Silencer in the cannon and use low octane fuel (91 RON or lower) will this pass the EPA Emissions tests? also the cop said if i put the Silencer in ill have to get it welded up. or should i just but a Standard 1"inch Muffler just for that day?

post ur comments wat u think

cheers

bill

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121903-wat-do-epa-check-for/
Share on other sites

I reckon the 91ron or lower is not worth it cause you can cause some damage to your engine plus you will run richer aswell so hence make your chances of them pinning something on you even worse. The silencer would be fine the same cop wont be at the epa station so i believe it would be all good as i know people who have the bolted silencer and never had a prob.

Edited by LatinR33
durring the week when i was driving to work in my R32 gts-t i got pulled over from the cops. (i wasnt doin anything bad and my car is completely stock part from the cat back Exhaust.) anyways they were lookin over my car trying to pin sumthing on me. anyways they said my Exhaust is to loud and ill have to goto the EPA to get it tested etc..

my question is if i put my Silencer in the cannon and use low octane fuel (91 RON or lower) will this pass the EPA Emissions tests? also the cop said if i put the Silencer in ill have to get it welded up. or should i just but a Standard 1"inch Muffler just for that day?

Did the cop say you MUST GO TO EPA, or did he say a "licenced exhaust tester". Because if he is only giving you an EPA for noise then all you have to do is go down to the closest exhaust shop listed on the EPA noise letter and get it noise tested. And if you have to put a silencer in it MUST be welded in to pass, but sometimes if you know the guy some rules are bent :dry: .

IMO it's probably easier to swap to a stock exhaust for the test.

I also don't see how 91RON fuel is going to help with emissions.

chaning fuel does not alter emissions when the ECU is looking for over 100ron anyway

It'll be a test, just going to a licensed tester, not the EPA station itself.

Get it tested, see how loud it is

go from there

simple

EPA is fun :(

belive it or not skylines run very low emitions

you'll pass emissions EASY

however noise is your problem...

bolting the silencer into the cannon is not good enough, when i failed noise at epa, i asked them if putting my silencer in there is good enough.. and they said no... only if it is completly welded in there.... and spot welding it a couple of times around the rim isnt good enough either!

you should be right... :)

-Ruffels

Did the cop say you MUST GO TO EPA, or did he say a "licenced exhaust tester". Because if he is only giving you an EPA for noise then all you have to do is go down to the closest exhaust shop listed on the EPA noise letter and get it noise tested. And if you have to put a silencer in it MUST be welded in to pass, but sometimes if you know the guy some rules are bent :( .

IMO it's probably easier to swap to a stock exhaust for the test.

I also don't see how 91RON fuel is going to help with emissions.

all the cop said is that ill be getting a letter in the mail from the EPA to go for a test. i dont really want to weld up the silencer to my cannon it looks sh!t and it sounds G.A.Y, but when using 98+ ron doesnt it burn more fuel and create more emissions?

no way.. skylines are tuned for japanese fuel (like 104oct) so its fine.. emmisions shouldnt be your worry.. your allowed 5% carbon monoxcide or what ever it was.. i had a screwed 02 sensor and still only blew 1.6%

WAY under

you'll be fine

... with sound just make a baffel plate with a few holes in it and jam it between one fo your flanges

they rev skylines upto 4800rpm at epa and it cant exceed 90db

all the cop said is that ill be getting a letter in the mail from the EPA to go for a test. i dont really want to weld up the silencer to my cannon it looks sh!t and it sounds G.A.Y, but when using 98+ ron doesnt it burn more fuel and create more emissions?

Not a problem. You just go down to a licensed epa exhaust shop. They will do the test. When you pass they give you a certificate, they keep one copy and send it to the epa saying you passed. Thats it.

DO what ash advised me to do. Get a mufler made up that decreases the diameter and just with a normal muffler. Lowered my car from 111DB to 89DB to just pass. And when u get home. Chuck the cannon back on :(

DO what ash advised me to do. Get a mufler made up that decreases the diameter and just with a normal muffler. Lowered my car from 111DB to 89DB to just pass. And when u get home. Chuck the cannon back on :(

;)

takes about 20mins :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...