Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All EDGE products besides the 25W50 are judged as 'Fully synthetic' by the boys at Castrol althought the API Group III and IV compositions may vary throughout the range. This could explain the price differences.

I also wonder what Cubes means by tunnelling in reference to oil filters.

Oh SANDY, I wouldn't change the oil filter. Just leave it until the next time you do another oil change! No point throwing it away..

Yer no point changing the filter...

Its just that I would tend to steer clear of the ryco's after I cut one open. :D

What I mean by tunneling is the filter media in sections blows open while the other pleats of the media stay close together.

The oil then only flows through these blown open sections of the media.

I got the word tunneling from doing a little search after I cut the filter open as I was a little concerned how the media looked.

This isn't the link I origionally found but it fits the bill... Has pics also. :nyaanyaa:

http://www.aus-cartalk.com/auspoc/techstuff.htm

So, for a 33 GTST that rarely gets a good opening, majority of trips are short (about 5-10kms) and pretty much doesnt get driven all that much, would the 10-60 be too thick?

Because i am using the 10-60 in my car now and i find that 2kms down the 5km trip, the temp on the my car has only just started to climb.

So would the 5-30 be a better go? Also would it handle the once in a long while thrashing and the occasional longer trip about 100kms?

yes, the tunneling is a problem. i only used genuine nissan filters in the past, but now use nismo veruspeed ones, or Greddy ones. also tried sard one, and power enterprise mag II.

yes, the tunneling is a problem. i only used genuine nissan filters in the past, but now use nismo veruspeed ones, or Greddy ones. also tried sard one, and power enterprise mag II.

lol they sound like rice filters. are u sure they arent rebadged rycos k&ns or something? why did u change to using them (apart from perhaps picking them up cheap from somewhere)

well I changed from using Genuine nissan filters for 2 reasons:

1. the greddy, nismo etc, claim increased flow and stronger relief valves (important as i run high oil pres) and some have magnets inside too, and I bought a whole lot in japan for reasonable price.

2. they are nicely coloured and say stuff on them like "Nismo" or "Greddy racing" etc and being mounted up high on my Grex remote filter mount presentation is important.

so yes, they are ricey. :P

nothing wrong with genuine nissan filters, and if i didn't have a fair stock of these I would use them instead.

I have heard of oil filter tunnelling supposedly being a problem, but logic tells me that it isn’t really a problem at all. My reasoning;

1. If the convolutions bow out, the theory is the oil finds the path of least resistance and flows though that area. But that assumes that the bow out area has the least resistance, but logic (and testing) tells me it doesn’t. It’s the same thickness filter media, same filtering specification, so why should the resistance be less? The answer is, it isn’t less, it’s exactly the same.

2. If (for some reason that I can’t logically determine) the oil does flow through the bow out area, it will eventually be contaminated first by the filtered particles. Hence it will no longer be the path of least resistance. Then the oil will simply flow though the other parts of the filter media. ie, one part of the filter will get dirtier quicker. So what? Natural hydraulic flow will ensure that happens, regardless of any tunnelling.

3. The dirty oil caused by tunnelling also tests my logic, why would the oil be dirtier when it flows though the tunnelling area? It’s the same thickness filter media, same filtering specification, so why should the filter quality be any less? The answer is, it isn’t less, it’s exactly the same.

So, until I see something that contradicts the logic, I am not inclined to believe that tunnelling is an issue.

:D cheers ;)

So, for a 33 GTST that rarely gets a good opening, majority of trips are short (about 5-10kms) and pretty much doesnt get driven all that much, would the 10-60 be too thick?

Because i am using the 10-60 in my car now and i find that 2kms down the 5km trip, the temp on the my car has only just started to climb.

So would the 5-30 be a better go? Also would it handle the once in a long while thrashing and the occasional longer trip about 100kms?

I'd give the 5W30 a go. Since your car doesn't properly warm up, the 10W60 will still be very thick. I wouldn't be suprised if your fuel economy was a little better with the 5W30 too.

  • 3 weeks later...

Nothing will "happen" as such. You may notice better fuel economy/engine responsiveness or less noise on cold starts... *depending* on what you've been using in the past. It should also easily go the distance. Ie 10,000km oil changes, providing you don't do track days etc.

Nothing will "happen" as such. You may notice better fuel economy/engine responsiveness or less noise on cold starts... *depending* on what you've been using in the past. It should also easily go the distance. Ie 10,000km oil changes, providing you don't do track days etc.

???

you should encourage people to change their oil every 5000km or every 6months whichever comes sooner. The oil might be alright for 10k but i'm sure most people drive pretty enthusiastically so it can only be good for the car to have more frequent oil changes :)

i change mine every 4k no track days but i do enjoy the touge action :)

anything over about 3grand or max oil pressure most of the oil is diverted through the relief valves. (all 4 of them)

all oil filters use the same media. if its a paper one. they atre made to meet cirtan industry standards.

the diferance is the "anti drainback valve" and the sealing flange gasket material.

yeah castrol egde prducts are as follows..

edge ow-40=castrol slx (synthetic)

edge 5w30=castrol txt softec " "

edge 10w60=formular R " "

edge 25w50=GP50 (mineral)

they were re labled to apeal to the younger car enthusiast.

:)

???

you should encourage people to change their oil every 5000km or every 6months whichever comes sooner. The oil might be alright for 10k but i'm sure most people drive pretty enthusiastically so it can only be good for the car to have more frequent oil changes :)

i change mine every 4k no track days but i do enjoy the touge action ;)

Well theres no problem changing out the oil sooner besides a lighter wallet. But half one of a synthetics's big advantages is because they have the capability of handling longer oil intervals than mineral oils. Take a look in USA for example, they market M1 "EP" which is guaranteed for 15,000 *miles*. So I believe 10,000km is suitable for most engines using a good quality synthetic, providing they are in good condition, don't run excessively rich or have heaps of blow by or don't see track use. Looking at hundreds of posted oil analysis's over the few past years has provided me with this conclusion. Remember just by looking at the oil doesn't really tell you anything.

If you want to drain out $90 every 6 months by all means.. just seems like a bit of a waste thats all.

T04GTR, I'm very sure oil filters do not use the same media. Sure they are cellulose but its like saying all engine oils are the same because they are liquids. There are definitely the better and worse ones out there. Also I don't think EDGE 5W30 is TXT softec because it does not have all of Softec's OEM approvals eg BMW-LL 01... unless you can find some data to prove otherwise but yeah.

Edited by Busky2k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...