Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After the last track day I had bad brake shudder. It basically went away after a couple of weeks of light city braking.

I've had the wheels off and one rotor is quite grooved and obviously needs machining. The other side seems fine.

Can I and should I machine just that side or is this bad?

Thanks.

In my professional Mechanical Engineers opinion and with over 20 years motor racing and mechanical experience there is no point machining something that doesn't need it as the only imbalance that "may" occur is a slight differential on heat absorption capacity due to the small amount of material lost. As always you must maintain knowledge of the state of your configuration and repair/replace accordingly.

Overhauling a single caliper is an issue of "it depends". If it is several years old without ever having overhaul then yes. If it was done a few races ago and just one is causing problems then no.

Cool.

Now I'm curious as to how it happened.

I always bed my pads in properly and I cool the brakes down properly on track days but on this occasion I was coming off the track and another person was also coming off in front of me. As we pulled in to the pit lane the Clerk of Course stopped the guy in front of me to tell him off for something which meant I was stopped behind him.

Thinking this would only take a few seconds I sat there with hot brakes and my foot on them for probably 1 minute.

It appeared to me that this was where the damage was done and the shuddering started but.. why only one rotor? And, why are there grooves in it and not the other? Do you think the pad had an uneven balance of material or something? I believe the grooves were there before the track day to a slight extent but were massive afterwards.

I run Bendix Ultimates street and track. Thinking of getting some Ferodo DS2500 (I think?)for the track and some other street pad that isn't so dusty.

What occurs with brakes is the driving to aid cooling (air quenching) allows them to retain their homogeneous properties throughout the disc. When you are forced to use your barkes hard and then stop the air can quench the exposed regions and the area covered by the pads cools much slower. This can cause the formation of regions of cementite - a tough slow wearing form of steel which can result in a shudder in the pedal as the other areas wear faster. Often close inspection reveals an outline of the brake pad as a fine line of dark pits on the disc. It can wear out if it is not deep and likewise can be machined out if not too deep but often results in a wrecked disc, even after a really hard stop on the road and then waiting at a light for a few minutes.

The deep grooves would be caused by some hard particles in the pad that have not been evenly distributed during manufacture so causing concentrated wear. While the disc is off place some emery on a flat surface and take the pad back smooth(ish). Bedding is important but remember a few days of city driving can be enough for bedding in too. I always have a couple of laps on the track day to make sure the brakes are warmed and bedded anyway.

If you are at all concerned do both discs at once, but I tend to be able to feel which wheel is a bit funny under brakes so know where to start looking for the problem.

..stating the obvious. But a lot of people mistake pad deposits in the slot as a worn rotor. Technically you actually increase the level of friction if you have pad deposits on the rotor. Grab a small screw driver and run it down the slot. You may find the material in the slot just falls out.

In my professional Mechanical Engineers opinion and with over 20 years motor racing and mechanical experience there is no point machining something that doesn't need it as the only imbalance that "may" occur is a slight differential on heat absorption capacity due to the small amount of material lost. As always you must maintain knowledge of the state of your configuration and repair/replace accordingly.

Overhauling a single caliper is an issue of "it depends". If it is several years old without ever having overhaul then yes. If it was done a few races ago and just one is causing problems then no.

Easy there Geoff.......... I did say "IMHO" ( in my humble opinion ). I didn't say you were wrong !!

And my opinion is not exactly an uneducated one either as I've been an active Motor Mechanic for 22 years ( cutting my teeth on Ferrari's, Lambo's, Porsche's etc ) and an Aircraft Engineer for 19. I have also been working with race cars for around 12 years.

As for the overhaul of one caliper thing, we're talking about an average street car ( no offence Abo Bob ) that would not normally receive the same amount of attention as most race cars ( in the brake department ) and therefore my comment.

Simply put, what I said is what I was taught and is what I practice, and again, is my "opinion" so chill !!

Yeah fair enough Scott. There is a lot of uneducated/unqualified opinion on here and while it is fine from a trade perspective to suggest doing a complete axle at once there is no supporting science to it, even if it is the way you were taught and continued to practice. If Adam or anyone alse is intelligent enough to ask can he do just one without asking why not then I'll respect that and give a yes or no answer. When someone wants to refute with a scientifically unjustifiable claim that then it's time to justify my answer. I also am a mechanic with over 20 years experience but I'm also an Engineer so I only give advice I can support professionally. Mind you if I'm wrong I'll wear that too.

BTW I've never been a fan of Bendix pads, even the ultimates but I do like RB74's from Racebrakes for a street/track pad. I hear good things about the Ferodo pads but haven't tried them. On road rubber on the track I haven't reached the limit of the RB74s during 5-7 lap sessions but with semi's and more power and decent suspension I feel I'm going to find the limit from advice I've received.

LOL...i would personally machine two. At the end of the day when they are worn you are goign to replace them together, so if you machine down a healthy rotor to the same size as your sick rotor it isnt that big a deal.

They are both going in the bin when one of them becomes undersized etc...

...runs and ducks for cover before 60mm artillary rounds hit my bunker :D

Waste of a Javelin missile to use it on a 32 but war makes monsters of us all :D

Jave.gif

Gee, I thought the purpose of this particular thread was to discuss opinions on the machining of 1 brake rotor vs. 2 at a given time and not to put down other car enthusiast's pride and joy ( even if in jest ) :O

Oh so sorry to tread on your feelings there; personal joke between myself and Roy (who knows my background) but feel free to make a martyr of yourself. I considered the discussion finished and the sledging was free to commence judging by previous comments.

Anyway BOT, I'm certain the purpose of the discussion was about saving money and time by only working on what was necessary. So far we have personal thoughts without scientific basis on the matter vs Engineering opinion based on science. The choice now remains up to the reader.

It's probably easy to overlook the fact that one disc is considered fine but throwing a bone here and recalling Scotts earlier correct comment that street cars generally won't get the same attention as a race car there is some value in taking both in for inspection and measurement to determine wear remaining, especially if you are not confident doing this yourself.

Bris you should know better :O

When are you coming over to swill beers? Got anything on Saturday? I'm moving stuff into the new workshop so I can start pulling down an MX-5 head. Some extra muscle would be good and there's all the food and booze you can consume.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...