Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ppls.

For a little while now, I have been populating an XL Spreadsheet of Dyno Figures to compare my tunes and modifications.

I got the idea off Cubes, so I can't take credit for the idea itself.

BUT.

I'm going to open up my little spreadsheet to everyone to play with and add their numbers too.

Maybe we could even prepare a HUGE one to compate all sorts of fun and wonderful things.

Anywhoo.

Attached is my spreadsheet with graphing, and you could perhaps add to it, or cut and paste it, or add your own numbers too and have play.

BASS OUT

Power_Curve_XL_Sheet.zip

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/126563-power-figures-dyno-chart/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

top work bass but i think it should be plotted into mysql with a php site so it can be customised and comparison at the click of a button. that excel sheet will suck when 5 other people add their results. like the v8 one you found, that was tops. we need that

I have done a remake of the sheet. It will require the re-entering of the figures unfortunately, but I have made a couple of changes.

I have changed the speed scale from 3's to 2's.

More notably, I have set up the graph to display only 5 figures at a time. I have added a Rank function (row 2) so you just enter in the numbers 1 to 5 above the figures you want the graph to display, then press the "Sort by Rank" button. The figures will be sorted and the graph will display the results you wanted.

Or you can sort by Max power, I have added a Max Power row at the bottom of the table, you can sort to show the 5 most powerful cars on the graph.

Hopefully this will be a little more user-friendly and a bit easier to read. I can always change the graph to read more than 5 if need be, but having the graph limited to a specific number of records, rather than all of them being shown at once will keep things a bit tidier.

I hope this helps.

Power_Comparison.zip

Needs to be RPM based not KPH

will be more accurate as kph, not rpm, as most people will only be guesstimating rpm. not many dyno sheets have rpm up the side to base it of, and if i go out on the road and say that i get 100kmh at 2850 rpm, that doesn't take into account both my speedo and tacho being out.

Edited by mad082

To save the hassle of re-entering all the figures, I made the changes to the original sheet.

The graph is now on a separate tab, and will display only the first 5 records. Enter the number 1 to 5 of the records you want to see, and press Sort by Rank to have those 5 appear on the graph. I added a Max power field, and a sort macro to sort by max power so show the top 5 most powerful cars.

Power_Curve_XL_Sheet.zip

Added RPM to the graph instead of speed. I used the formula to work out the RPM for the speeds we were using, rather than reworking the speed for a given RPM because that would require re-entering all the power figures.

Power_Curve_XL_Sheet.zip

  • 3 months later...

just curious, on the graph 102km/h is lined up with 3643rpm...on my dyno graph the rpm's dont line up with the graph 102km/h=3849rpm

what can be possible answers to this...as far as i know ratios are stock ( i havent changed them) would it be my rims? 19s?

just makin sure ay

cheers...ben.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...