Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi there

i'm looking into getting a TD06 20G 8cm for my cefiro - it has a 2.4 RB20 motor in it. currently have a hks 2530 on the car.

I'm after info with people running the TD06 on a rb25 and also rb20 to see if it is suited for my application... supporting mods are - gtr injectors / z32 afm / power fc / full zorst no mufflers/cat with screamer / fmic / fuel pump / pod / bov etc...

this turbo is also internal gate.

PLEASE HELP!

also if i get a good response i may have a hks 2530 for sale located in SA.

thanks

-Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/126750-td06-20g-8cm-on-rb24/
Share on other sites

run for your life.............

heheh just look for another turbo kit, had trouble with the internal gate, it just doesnt work, you will have to custom fit an external gate and blah blah, basically spend $$$$ to achieve anything. cost me 3k to get it working properly

get a 2535 or go garret unless u like the noisy wastegates

Edited by kidd
i've been speaking to a couple people and some have actually said that it may be more responsive than the 2530?

it feels more responsive than the 2530 on normal driving but it depends on what gear youre on, normally had to drop it into second when a 2530 fitted car would only need third to boost up eg when the traffic lights go amber at 60km/h and we cbf stopping :devil:

If you fit an oil cooler i doubt you'll have problems with the engine temperature (assuming your cooling system is in good nick atm).

I think a TD06 with small rear housing on the rb24 will be a bit of a ball tearer to be honest. Obviously less responsive than a 2530 size turbo but not too far behind and a fair bit more top end. I have seen internal gate td05's perform fine so i don't see how the internal gate 6 will have problems.

If you could get your hands on a used 2535 it could be ok . Or since you have the T3 flanged HKS exhaust housing you could buy a Garrett GT2871R in 48 compressor trim - minus the exhaust housing and fit it in your existing HKS exhaust housing . Assuming your 2530 is a Skyline specific one it has the TO4B compressor cover like Garretts GT2871R series uses so externally it would look the same and use the same water/oil/exhaust plumbing and waste gate actuator . The only difference may be the comp cover inlet boss being 3" or 76mm where the HKS 2530 probably had this bit machined off and an adapter bolted on . You could either get this boss turned down in a lathe or use some kind of step down in the inlet plumbing depending on what you car has .

Just in case you didn't know the 2530 and 2535 and all GT2871R series plus a few others use the same identical turbine and bearing housing so the HKS exhaust housing goes bolt . Done the above mentioned way you wind up with virtually a HKS GT-RS but in 48 comp trim instead of 52 trim (better when boost threshold is an issue eg Cu in starved RB20) and without HKS's custom port shrouded comp cover . The 48 trim compressor is less likely to surge than the 52 trim GT-RS but you could get the 2871R's comp cover drilled and slotted so the port shrouding worked TO4Z style if required .

So if you play your cards right this could be a very cost effective upgrade with what is really a brand newin .

Cheers A .

post-9594-1153454992.jpg

They arent a bad turbo, though as someone else suggested the internal wastegate versions do not seem to enjoy the success of the external gate types. I think thats mostly due to the exhaust housing design and subsequent dump pipe the internal gate version has to run.

Here is an external gate version on a completely std RB20.

Dyno_RacePace.jpeg

well i've made 236 previously with stock rb20 / fmic / zorst / 1.3 bar / hks fcd / stock ecu and injectors...

not going to kill myself if i dont get 240 hehe... just a goal. be happier with insane midrange/lower than peak power atm.

cheers roy and like you said can always change it down the track if i want to :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...