Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seems a little different to other Series 2's

Please Pm me as well if not to much hassle

ECR33-133451

GGKBRTFR33VDAAA-AA

Ant info would be awsome

Thanks

this vin kept coming up with errors, but the model code showed this:

post-34711-1244612803_thumb.jpg

post-34711-1244613094_thumb.jpg

Thanks for that,

One question, how will I know if it's V-spec or not - I remember someone told me 'W' on model number indicates it's V-spec, is this right?

Cheers

Grant

Hi,

Was given this vin for a 93 R32 GTR:

6t91mpaaapxavh008

Has no 6U9000 infront.

Eng no: is rb26003690a

Unfortunately that's one of the ones where they just made up a new aussie VIN rather than the usual prefixing the jap one with 6U90000. You're gonna need to get the jap VIN off the firewall, as there's nothing we can do from the engine no or aussie VIN (my 33 was the same...).

Unfortunately that's one of the ones where they just made up a new aussie VIN rather than the usual prefixing the jap one with 6U90000. You're gonna need to get the jap VIN off the firewall, as there's nothing we can do from the engine no or aussie VIN (my 33 was the same...).

Ok, guess ill have to get the one on the firewall.

Thanx for your help :)

Note that you can feed the following web page your Aus VIN & RAWS approval Plate # to get the particulars on the complaince process for your car:

http://raws.dotars.gov.au/rawswebpublic/RAWPubVehSearch.asp

Like most of us, you probably have a version that pre-dates the '35.

However there are some who have passed the tests and been granted the next level

:)

soz dude, bit off topic... but is your dr30 the one that was in parked in front of turbo tune recently?

*grumbles about wasting 2.2gb of his 100gb on junk*

Guess I can help out others!

So there is a newer version floating around? The stag I'm trying to search is only a 2001 and this listing said 2005!

You need to speak to someone who has the later version of FAST for advice on that one - 2.2GB sounds a bit small.

soz dude, bit off topic... but is your dr30 the one that was in parked in front of turbo tune recently?

Nope - it was entered in AJD though.

:)

Thanks for that,

One question, how will I know if it's V-spec or not - I remember someone told me 'W' on model number indicates it's V-spec, is this right?

Cheers

Grant

Anyone know the answer to this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...