Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you unplug your fuel lines your car ain't running :) Technically you're not "driving" so you don't win sorry :P

Yeah 250kms; most of that tank was spent going nowhere; just revving the engine trying out some new stuff we did.

With that in mind; you could leave your car idling for a day and you get 0kms out of a tank!

Say have you guys seen the 98 Octane they sell at Liberty? It's about the same price as regular unleaded because it contains more ethanol, but apparently on rexnet the guys have found good experiences with it.

What are your thoughts on Liberty 98 Octane PULP?

Wouldn't go near it... sorry!

Fuel is not that expensive at the moment; staying relatively stable when you think about it. Meh; if you think 98RON from BP, Shell or Caltex is bad - try getting your fuel from ELF (113RON)

The race team opposite us purchased 105L for $1,100.00 :P

Thanks for the tip Stan. I've just done a search on SAU... guess the overall sentiment is without a full retune it is not quite suitable for our pre 2005 skylines.

If you unplug your fuel lines your car ain't running Technically you're not "driving" so you don't win sorry

Yeah 250kms; most of that tank was spent going nowhere; just revving the engine trying out some new stuff we did.

With that in mind; you could leave your car idling for a day and you get 0kms out of a tank!

well then i'll just poke a hole in my tank then go for a drive down the road, and drive with my left foot on the brakes so i have to keep it floored to go anywhere.

But you're still going somewhere...

Why not just jump into the car; and just hold the revs down 0kms, 65L

Cool my car uses infinite L of fuel to go nowhere

thats part of my problem, the maccas here sux, so you spend ages sitting in drive thru, and its too cold to turn the car off.

Normally floats around the 350-400km mark.

i haven't got over about 320-330 since i've had the car, but i am only running stock ecu, no piggy back, so i'm running pretty rich. and it is hilly as hell here, so that chews up a bit more fuel. put a new o2 sensor in hoping it would help but it didn't. but i am also running pretty high boost, and just put in a remapped ecu which is dumping in even more fuel. but getting a safc when i get my tax back.

Yeah I got a stock manual S2 R33 gtst with pod filter and cat back HKS 3". I drive 50/50 pretty enthusiastically/cruising and im lucky to see 240-300kms to about 55-60 litres. Would a SAFC help to reduce fuel consumption? What other mods could reduce usage as I am spending S**T loads on fuel atm.

Damn some of you guys are using some serious fuel huh. Its just as bad as a Gen III commodore which is twice the size!! I'd say get your O2 sensors checked and try keeping off boost when taking off the lights if you can.

Thanks for the replies guys. Well good to know it's not uncommon then. I'm coming from an R32 Gts-t, and that averaged around 10L/100km. Even with an added 500cc and variable timing, I wouldn't have thought the R34 GTT would be that much thirstier.. oh well :mad:

Might try freeing up the exhaust and running a SAFC and seeing if that helps things along a little.

It definitely gets me why fuel consumption vary's so much between the models. >_<

Its 100% not the displacement as my fuel consumption hardly changed going from the 2ltr to the 3ltr.

Normal driving (no open road or peak hour, just local short trips with a 50-80km/h speed limit) with the odd squirt see's on average 11L/100km's, dipping to 10.5ish if i'm really cruisy for the whole tank.

Last tank of juice I drove it hard, every set of lights was up on boost in every gear, usually i short shift around at max 2000-2500rpm with almost zero vac and get it in top gear asap and keep it in decel fuel cut for as long as possible. But yes.. this tank, many hills squirts, reminded me why I bought the car in the first place and suprised me how well they really do handle. But yer.. last tank... Bumped up marginally to 12L/100km's. Or.. 430km's to 52litres.

The cars running clean injectors and the o2 sensor has been replaced with a genuine item. I replaced the o2 sensor when fuel economy dipped to 350km/s per 50litres. It made no difference, replaced injectors (larger items and trimmed fuel in pfc). Fuel economy instantly back. I doubt this is every ones problem but it was mine. :O

Maybe the R33/R34's VCT actually hurts economy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've seen similar actually in my situation. You never know what tables are attempted to be used when the car thinks it's -99C or +200C. The fail state is not usually that extreme but you know what I mean - it was in my case though! This is where being able to read all the sensors is useful cause you see this stuff really quickly.
    • The above is very important. However as long as you keep timing relatively low, it's plausible to make your own knock ears and plausible to learn to tune with a modern ECU that can do wideband O2 correction like a boost controller. I mean if you only have one viable road to even drive the car on, learning to tinker to this level may be worth doing given you can't do much else with the car...?
    • I find the fact that the rear plate has to be bent inwards at the rear not so bad: but the front is just awful: It's like come on. (these are my very old, now retired/turned in plates) TBH it is a lot of money to fix a minor issue, the fact I said "I'll never really spend the money on doing this" is why people ended up buying them as a gift for a 'car guy' who can be hard to shop for.. for car guy things.
    • I just bent the ends of my premo plates. It even went through Regency like that after the engine conversion and the inspector (a great bloke!) just squinted his eyes and said "I didn't see that". Plates, and how they look, are just something that have zero importance to me.
    • Yeah, I would have said the same. It makes me suggest that there are other things wrong, such that the ECU is totally unhappy with the broken sensor. The only other thought here is that maybe it is shorted, which might cause a different issue to the typical "disconnected" sensor.
×
×
  • Create New...