Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gday guys and gals

installed a batmbl dump pipe + hi flow turbo. great products!! got it installed yesterday but they left the heat shield off because i assumed they couldnt bolt it back on due to the tight fit. modified the heat shield today with the good old angle grinder to make it fit using just one exhaust bolt thats easily accesible. durring the process took the other 2 bolts out to test fit. now i can hear the turbo spool very early, below 2k even before induction noise starts. is this normal or do i have an exhaust leak? bolts not tight enough?? they are pretty tight but i dont want to over tighten them incase i snap them which ive been doing lately...lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128943-dump-pipe-and-quick-spool/
Share on other sites

I know.. its a VERY VERY tight fit indeed..

Esp that stupid aircon pipe in the way of the wastegate pipe.

would have been better if the wastegate pipe came over a little more to the left n up, and the 02 sensor down the bottom..

But anyways think i hear early spoolin sounds as well..

But otherwise quailty is excellent. you can deff feel the incresae in power.. love it..

but now cravin for more power..

Edited by siddr20

You would be supprised inthe increse in low spool now and i have stainless

one and from under the car you can hear it pulsing in the pipe ,so

it wount be a leak and you would definatly hear in the bay.

so all is good , just check them in a week o so

as they man need to be retorqued.

thanks guys.. ill check it in a week to re tighten em up.

car drives silky smooth now throughout the rev range. its fantastic!!. does anyone think the direct contact with waistgate pipe and the air con pipe will cause any long term problems?? i was thinking of modifiy the aircon pipe mount to move it over a tad.

Yes it will, even tho the aircon pipe has heat wrappin around it already!!

Sine it sits like a mm off, during summer it will melt that wrapping for sure.. IM gonna reallocate that pipe soon.

I would wrap it up just incase, coz you never know. Just imagine the temps down there on hot days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...