Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey people,

Anybody had there car tuned with 98ron? Had any problems with it?

mods to my car are:

3inch turbo back exhuast

avcr .8bar

fmic

bosch 044

pod/cai

Rebuilt & Reconditioned Engine (forged Piston, GTR Rods etc)

Just got pro to put in my PFC & tune it and currently the the car is making about 130rwkw (will confirm)! but he cant get anymore out of it! seems to be the fuel is shit!

so anyone had any problems?

Cheers

i take it you have a r33 as thats what your pic is. if so 130rwkw is pretty pore i would think even for an rb20 with thoes mods you should get more. maybe you need more boost. boost is your friend.

The best you could get is 130?? that is shit house.

I had my car tuned on 11psi by Dave Powell (before he left) on Pro Auto's dyno using 95RON and made 168rwkw.

I only have boost controller, fmic, SAFC II and a 3in turbo back.

More recently i made 152rwkw when Dr Drift came down and tuned my car but this was only because it was missing above that. More than likely my problem was my plugs being incorrectly gapped but due to time restraints I didn't have time to regap them so went for the safe 152rwkw tune. That was on 95RON too.

On 98RON I'd expect at least 170-190rwkw on about 12psi. Something is up with that result.

yer its a r33 with a rb25! yer it got 138rwkw on .7bar which is crap with all them mods! pro said run a few tanks of 95ron and come back and see it make a diff!

the crap thing about it was pro put it on the dyno with out touching it and its made 111rwkw which is a joke! so he managed to gain 27rwkw out of it!

i am going to get another power run done on another dyno to compare!

have a look at the dyno sheet & let me know

the blue is befour the pfc was tune & red is with pfc tuned

i must say after reading alot of people post of there power out put this would have to be the shitest one ever!

Cheers

Alan

post-16969-1155031091.jpg

Edited by al_r33

27rwkw is a huge gain!

Puting ur car on another dyno ISN'T going to make ur car have more power...

Comparitivly, that dose seem quite low however. How dose it feel on the road? Do you get hammered by corolla's?? A full weight gts-t with 130rwkw would feel a little slugish...

I'd like to know what Andy said? hmm...

yer 27kw is a good gain! but when its makin 111rwkw its just crap!! the thing is how can i beat vy ss utes, wrx's etc if i had 111rwkw! i just find it hard to beleive that a 5000km old engine & all them mods make 138rwkw!

well the curve looks okay to me. Maybe the settings of the dyno are wrong and its just reading low. Settings like inlet temp and BP can effect the actual numbers.

If it feels fast thats all that really matters.

How much did he charge you just out of interest?

I'm looking to get a service and a re-tune for 98RON of my SAFC II and not sure where to take it since Dave has gone.

Well if u can do that. Then what dose it matter what a piece of paper says?

What did Andy say?

I'm happy my car runs 10's on street tyres more than it has a 393rwkw dyno sheet...

Edited by XRATED

can i ask why you dont run more boost as surely the mods you have would suport 1bar (as much as the turbo)

just wondering why please dont shoot me.

and like xrated said if your happy with what it does peak HP isnt a consern.

can i ask why you dont run more boost as surely the mods you have would suport 1bar (as much as the turbo)

just wondering why please dont shoot me.

and like xrated said if your happy with what it does peak HP isnt a consern.

He's got an R33. The recommended daily max is 12psi and from what others have posted on this forum the stock turbo doesn't flow any more air above this anyway so you're not getting bugger all power increase. What you do get from running 1 bar on the stock turbo is a time bomb.

Andy basically said its either the fuel or the or the ratio of my motor might be high! But we put it down to fuel! Cost me $495inl gst! I dont want to run 1bar im tryin to make it last for awhile! i know for a fact that its definitly not slow & doesnt fell like it has a 138rwkw. anyway im over it!

cheers

Al

Edited by al_r33

JDM engines are tuned from the factory for 98RON. Anyhow, just had mine dyno tuned this week with a tank of 98 - 146rwkw at 8psi rb20det with an r33 turbo and SAFC-2. So for an RB25DET thats a poor figure, but you know, its not all about max power.... I could easily get more out of mine but we felt even the slightest bit of detonation (as in, not audible by ear unless using the expensive tuning gear) was not worth it.

u up north or down south frigjam?

How much they charge you to get the SAFC II retuned?

South... All up I spent just over $500 in total for 2 occasions on the dyno, the car went in with a few problems, first the fuel pump was too weak, and then the TPS was playing up giving the ECU a wrong signal, rewired an R33 TPS in and that worked, also allowed the SAFC-2 to also work properly....

However any other car just with a SAFC-2 already wired in, ready to go, looking at 2 hours max on the dyno so $200 at the very most. To get any real benefit of the SAFC-2 you'll need some decent boost control (i use the AVC-R), and an adj fuel reg would also be handy.

Cheers

Paul.

Edited by frigjam

Stock as a rock RB25DET is between 135-145rwkw.

My R33 ran 190 rwkw on 95 fuel with exhaust, FMIC, 12psi & Power FC ac ouple of yrs ago.

Had my R34 tuned late last yr with the same mods & fuel (NEOs are higher comp) & made 192rwkw.

Both done on Pro Auto's dyno.

So yeah, some thing not right with the dyno or the car.

He's got an R33. The recommended daily max is 12psi and from what others have posted on this forum the stock turbo doesn't flow any more air above this anyway so you're not getting bugger all power increase. What you do get from running 1 bar on the stock turbo is a time bomb.

sorry i miss read that he was running .7 bar which would be close to 12psi but i also said in brackets (what ever the turbo would take)

and i also said dont shoot me over it im JUST ASKING!!!!

sorry i miss read that he was running .7 bar which would be close to 12psi but i also said in brackets (what ever the turbo would take)

and i also said dont shoot me over it im JUST ASKING!!!!

no need to shout :P

I simply replied why he wouldn't go to 1 bar :sorcerer:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...