Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good result mate peak power is very impressive, Id like to know what the go is with the torque spike to Dale. Boost starts at 2000 rpm 12psi by 3750 then slowly creeps to 13.7 at 4750 does this seem right for a GTRS people.

Edited by Munna1

Thanks mates! I'm extremely pleased with my results...

This matches my goals perfectly... I wanted something streetable that i could enjoy at track events occasionally...

As for the torque spike... i'm not sure... might have something to do with my tomei poncams?

This setup I'm running is in my 95 s14... i love it! Handles beautiful on the road... the GTRS spools rather quickly for the amount of power it can push... I was wanting something to enjoy on the streets and this turbo performs just as i had imagined it...

In stock form... boost would build and set you back... but then as you climbed higher into the 5-6000 rpms it seemed like it would start to drop off...

Now, it just wants to go... it feels like it would just keep pulling ... i bumped up my rev limit (using my pfc) from 6900 to 7000....

But in any case i'm more than pleased with the results... My tuner informed me if i wanted to go any further with power i'd need to upgrade injectors... he said they're getting border line to the limit (i'm using nismo 550cc)

Ok my tips and comments:

I think full boost is a little late for my liking. What boost level are you aiming for? I would increase the boost duty cycle to get a small spike at hopefully around 3600rpm that you can then flatten out later in the rev range.

What boost control are you using btw? If it's something that has different duty cycles able to be set depending on rpm like an AVC-R then increase it later where the boost drops off or drop it in the middle if you are only after 12psi.

Apart from that, does anyone here have any idea how this translates to rwkw on a dyno dynamics dyno?

If the hub dynos if anything read higher then the 550cc injectors you have should be well up to the task. Yes, looking at the a/f plot it is starting to head north at the top end which indicates lack of fuel.

But reading your list of mods, I would be looking to the walbro pump as a suspect before the injectors.

I had the PowerFC boost controller on there but the tuner could never get it to work properly...

The shop where this was tuned is an Apexi excel dealer and certified tuner... he was on the phone with Apexi telling them what was up and they couldn't even figure out why it wasn't working... he said maybe the solenoid was messed up...

So right now it's just got a bleed valve on there... Which i'm not exactly thrilled about... but it gets the job done

The injector duty cycle on the settings in the PFC are at 86.5%

Ahh I didn't see the mods cos they were in the sig. Yeah that walbro is running lean up top like they all do. Ditch it and get something better. A GTR pump should do the job.

I think the injectors should be up to the task too. Check the pump.

Ahh I didn't see the mods cos they were in the sig. Yeah that walbro is running lean up top like they all do. Ditch it and get something better. A GTR pump should do the job.

I think the injectors should be up to the task too. Check the pump.

Unfortunately GTR pumps are a little hard to source here in the states... What do you think about a Supra TT pump instead?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...