Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

16 days to close of entries guys. We need to finalise entries, gather to complete the entry form and centralise the entry fees for payment. We won't get a club meeting in before the entries close.

Those that want to compete or attend and assist/support, can you give a firm indication if you haven't already?

Brisnosaurus, can you update the list of entrants?

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

16 days to close of entries guys. We need to finalise entries, gather to complete the entry form and centralise the entry fees for payment. We won't get a club meeting in before the entries close.

Those that want to compete or attend and assist/support, can you give a firm indication if you haven't already?

Brisnosaurus, can you update the list of entrants?

*Jumps up and down waving while screaming "ME ME ME"*

  • 2 weeks later...

I completely agree.

If those that are committed to this please add their name. We are going to need 6 cars. I think a meeting is a very good idea... Im up for one where ever it will be, but we need to act sooner rather than later.

1) Roy

2) Aaron

3) Chrisman

4)

5)

6)

Interested

1) Rus

2) GTTR34

Well the flying TX5 is toast so Scott (chrisman) will be out I guess, but entries close Monday Afternoon at 5pm. That leaves this weekend to get it sorted, and with James and Troy doing Dutton leabes it a little tight.

I predict a DNS at this stage....... :(

Well the flying TX5 is toast so Scott (chrisman) will be out I guess, but entries close Monday Afternoon at 5pm. That leaves this weekend to get it sorted, and with James and Troy doing Dutton leabes it a little tight.

I predict a DNS at this stage....... :)

I suspect you are right.. shame.... as it would have been good fun with lots of track time.

Going to send off my oil for analysis this weekend, hopefully it doesnt haev coolant or particles in it and the engine is ok. If so i will be doing the number to try and do this event...but im looking a bit shakey financially after Dutton. I dont even have tyres left over :P

Also I spoke to my RWC guy around the corner about a month ago about this, as he is on the PAIRC committee and he thinks that the entries might be full.

But I guess if your guys can get it together then a simple phone call will confirm or deny.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...