Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

he guys , latley ive been debating on wether to rebuild my rb20 or go the rb25 conversion. its been hard trying to find an rb25 with all the other things like gearboxes and turbos, all that shit. anywaz ive been told to rebuild the 20 and get the head flowed ect. ive got around 8 grand to play with and im in perth. wats the go with rebuilding rb20's . i want the car for the street daily driver and for abit of fun on the track aswell. any info of any kind would be appriciated

simon :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131626-rebuilding-a-rb20/
Share on other sites

stock bottom end is good for about 400hp but to be safe I would be changing to forged pistons. ROSS make custom pistons for the RB20DET and they will set you back around $1500 including rings.

I would definately consider the porting you mentioned as every little bit helps with the 20's. You should also have the rods resized to ensure correct fitment and lose the chances of spinning a bearing easily. 8 g's is not really going to satisfy the budget once you get right into it. You should do cams, injectors, AFM upgrades while you are at it and make sure you have a clutch that will do the job. The RB20 gearbox will not last long at 200rwkw so you should also budget for an RB25DET box and fit it at the same time.

8k you have to play with?

RB25 conversion mate.

If you had a larger turbo etc etc already i'd say stick with the RB20.

But its pretty standard, so any cash you spend it going to better you regardless.

IMO Rebuilding the 20 and then doing a turbo will cost you more than an RB25 conversion, keeping the stock turbo and getting a PowerFC or similar.

RB20 box will be fine with a stock RB25 without a drama, even upto (give or take) 250rwkw in my expirience.

And that will be under 8k quite easily without having to do the gearbox. Which could even allow you to get a larger turbo for the RB25 + injectors/AFM 6-12 months down the track if you save a tad more :)

  • 2 weeks later...

If you run good gearbox fluid, a sensible clutch and dont drive like you belong in a padded room then an RB20 box is fine up to 240-250rwks. It will go bang sooner or later, but my old thing is still tracking well after 180,000kms so its not unheard of. Some die straight after a power hike, so if it doesnt go in the first month or so you may be able to cheat death.

The big question is what are you wanting to do with the car and what can you so yourself?

8k is a lot of money. If your RB20 is happy at the moment, then i would grab a 2530, remapped ECU and be on your way for around $2500. Spend the rest of your money on big nights out and driving the car at the track with a good 210-220rwkws.

If you really want to spend the 8k, then its a lot of money if you can do things yourself, not a lot if your paying a workshop. You would be looking at around 3.5k for a mechanic to do the swap for you. You will need a Pfc and you will make around 200rwkws with a turbo that may go bag at any time.

So say 3.5k for work, 3k for engine and gearbox and driveshaft...it leaves you with a bit of money to play witha high flow turbo etc that will net you around 240rwkws.

RB25 is a good building block, but its a lot of money for that bit of extra low end grunt. RB20, well i wouldnt personally even crack the motor. Just throw a big turbo on it and go have a ball driving it. Be careful even with cams. I have ummed and arred so often with cams, but am concerned about losing even more grunt under 3,500rpm for that little bit of extra top end. I want cams more for the low to mid, and ppl have raised concern over me losing low end so havent bothered.

Which ever way you go, plan it well as you can, and get as many fixed price quotes as possible from ppl that have done it before and know what they are on about. You can do a turbo and ecu upgrade in 2 days. I can see an RB25 transplant taking 2 weeks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...