Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well one of my points is that you dont need forged pistons or different rods to make 700 hp from an rb 26 that is a proven fact you need turbo / 's to suit and a fuel system

cams you can reprogram the r32 gtr ecu or you can fit a plug in power fc or what ever ecu you like.

take for example an rb 26 for sale fully rebuilt stock pistons 272 cams balance, ecu etc 7500 turbo /'s to suit 3-4k injectors 1 k cooler 1500 ,fuel pumps 600 add 2k for things forgotten am I close?

hey squizz,

i didn't imply that the RB20 box will be good for 10's, i was mearly saying that it will be a simple bolt-up operation if he goes the RB30 conversion which will be nice for the street.

do u think a 3 spd auto with a 4000rpm converter, factory 4.11s in the ass is streetable?

meggala,

you're right, although $7.5k would only be for the engine w/out ECU/loom/injectors, etc, twin bb turbo's would cost more on the $4-5k, full fuel system would be about $1k, ECU (Power-FC) ~$1.5k or Autronic/Motec ~$3k, injectors - ~$1k and you've forgotten manifolds and external wastegates (needed for this kind of power) which would be more in the field of $3-4k.

So, you're looking at about $17-18k+ for a standard (reco'd) RB26DETT engine where for less than that, you'll have a fully rebuilt and forged RB30 bottom end along with the RB25DET which is very capable of producing the stated ~700hp reliably.

Also, given that it is a larger capacity engine (3000cc vs 2600cc) there will be more torque and it will produce the power easier, with less boost and rpms.

Speak to Mattlowth, he'll tell u what it costs and the capabilities of the engine. his is making 320rwkw (430rwhp) on only 16psi.

I'm sure if it's pushed a bit more, it will comfortably and reliably make over 500rwhp.

Originally posted by InExtremis

Hey riggaP, How is power/fuel consuption related to physics???

Fuel stores the potential energy that gets combusted and eventully makes the car move. To move the car faster you need to convert more chemical potential energy into mechanical kinetic energy (ie make it more efficient with the same amount of fuel) or alternatively let more fuel and air into the engine to combust (which is gonna be inevitable if were talking a 10 sec car).

Getting a car that runs 14s into the 13s could be done by making the engine more efficient (ie aftermarket ECU) without a significant increase in fuel consumption, but to get from 14s to 10s is gonna require a shit load of fuel to produce the power required hence making it a crap daily driver (just one of the reasons anyway).

I hope that makes sense...

riggaP,

Yes I understand the fact that potential energy leads to kinetic energy, this is the same for everything that moves, but increasing fuel and oxygen to create additional power doesnt just relate to physics. Remeber we are only talking about the power/fuel ratio.

Of course a moving car is related to physics, but when talking about the AMOUNT of fuel that is required to put out an AMOUNT of power, it is not just physics but also involves mathematics and chemistry.

The additional oxygen and fuel is used to create a greater CHEMICAL reaction, thus this reaction uses more fuel and creates more power. The fact that this reaction creates kinetic energy is irrelevent, because the consumption of fuel has already been determined from the chemical reaction.

Thus an increase in power is a result of a greater chemical reaction, where a greater volume of chemical components are required.

I agree that physics are involved, since the final output is power and cars move! but the ratio itself relies on a chemical concept, the physical concept is simply the result. I think what you meant was that it is simple science.

I don't mean any harm or flaming, all in good fun. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...