Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb25 Diference Bitween R33 And R34

kghl
 Share

Recommended Posts

pixel8r Mentor

pixel8r

Posted
Posted

I think both had vct, but the neo is infinitely variable whereas the earlier rb25 is not (more like on-off), so i believe. my knowledge on all this is fairly limited, but this is what i've picked up over time by asking people the same question.

I've been told the head is different on the neo and uses direct injection (not sure what that means exactly).

Also the turbo is slightly different - which will affect the different power outputs between the two as well - but as for the engine, the above is all i'm aware of.

Otherwise there are differences you can see from photos, like different throttle body, and with the neo cover removed there are other visual differences also. I think its just minor, ie. enough to tell them apart.

On the whole I think the two are fairly similar, but with the neo they were trying to reduce emissions (which they did) and also managed to squeeze an extra ~20kw from it. Thats a fair effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • klutched
      GOT SUM's RB34

      By klutched · Posted

      This morning I carefully reinstalled the manifold and started looking at a couple of things I need to do.  Heat wrap arrived sometime today so I popped into the shed with the missus dishwashing gloves and started wrapping the first half of the dump and the screamer/plumb back.  Once I do the second half I'll be able to final fit the turbo and exhaust up.  Also pulled the harness out today and started terminating it at the ECU end. A connector is done, just need to run the remaining wires that arent in the harness - 12v, gnd and couple I/O
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      A31 is pretty much the same thing without HiAIDS I mean CAS, no improvement lol. Not to late to send it.
    • carnoobb
      Newbies

      By carnoobb · Posted

      Thanks for all the replies! I also wanted to ask if wheels that were fitted on Ford Falcons would fit the 350GTs as well? In the area I'm at there aren't that many options for secondhand wheels and new ones here are way out of my budget. From what I've seen, most of the wheels that are available that were fitted on Ford Falcons have an offset of +33 to +36, with a centre bore of 70.5mm whereas the stock 350GT's ones are 66mm, can't seem to find any hubcentric rings that fit that difference though. 
    • sonicii
      Newbies

      By sonicii · Posted

      215/45/18 tyres are probably a little on the low side compared to the factory tyre, it should be closer to a 245/45/19, which will get you about an extra 11mm of height, and should make you speedo read a bit closer to reality. 245/45/19s will be a bit too far the other way and you risk a speeding ticket as your speedo might read slower than your actual speed.  245/40/19s would be correct if you are going to 19in rims, they will give you a similar total diameter to the 245/45/18 tyres.  
    • GTSBoy
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's something I forgot to put in my list. The aggressive anti-squat in R32 is a f**king menace. I still need to decide if I'm going to drag the subframe out of my car and weld in the GKTech corrector kit. The main reason to dither is the need to switch to spherical joints in the lower arm to account for the twist induced in the rear pivot caused by lowering the front pivot. And yes...we do put better subframes in R32s, and I wish I'd gotten an S14 one instead of an A31 when I did the "take off and nuke it from orbit" HICAS delete all those years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...