Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so I bought my car knowing the engine was run without oil to the point of the exhaust cam seizing. This was the result after an aftermarket oil hose fitting un-screwed itself.

After some good advice from some members on here I have decided to ditch the old engine for a possible rebuild down the track... Will also come in handy for spares.

My question is this- For the amount of time the engine was run with no oil (presumably with some boosting?)

Is there any chance there would be some minor damage made to the turbo bearing?

Turbo in question is an HKS T04e

Also could anyone help with the hp rating of my turbo? Only numbers I can see is .50 wich is the A/R of the front cover yes?

Every other T04e I have seen for RB20/25 has either the .56 or .60 front cover.. Is my turbo designed for slightly quicker spooling compared these, While sacrificing on overall power?

Edited by Drift_Limo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/132658-turbo-oil-feed-starvation/
Share on other sites

You have asked 2 questions;

1. Is the turbo damaged? No idea, no way to tell, waste of time guessing. Take it to turbo workshop and have it checked.

2. HKS don’t publish compressor maps. Last time I bothered looking, there were 6 or 7 specifications of Garrett “T04E”. Outputs ranging from 350 bhp to around 500 bhp, so take your pick.

:ermm: cheers :(

I would guess that if the turbo was being boosted without oil long enough for the engine to run out of oil and seize the camshaft, the turbo will be shagged, and thet may be the least of your problems, for the $150 or so, i would rip the sump off and have a quick look at the bearings

Suggest you locate the CHRA ID tag number, and post up that, along with any numbers off the housings.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...