Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep LOL there is personalised degrees of nice .

Confusion exists about "T66" and the back yard handle of 67 or GT67 . The T66 is a dinosaur by todays standards compared to the TO4R wheel (BCI-8D) . Unfortunately the Americans call many comp wheels by inducer diametre hence 67 ot GT67 for the 84mm 63Trim TO4R wheel . The "T66" wheel is larger at ~ 91 mm and smaller trim but not really equal performance .

Matter of opinion but I stand with the Garrett engineers - 30 series turbine and 40 series compressor is not a very smart combination . HKS chose to take a big comp trim drop with their exclusive GT3040 version ie 56T down to 50T . I can't believe this was done by accident .

As I've said before you could get a HKS smaller comp trim GT3040 and fit the larger GT35 turbine but its not a cheap exercise .

Cheers A .

  • 3 months later...
  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im kinda in the same boat can get a good deal on i beleave is a 3540, its the turbo off xr6 turbo.. mates dad bought a half cut for a mustang n is thinkin of ditchin it thought bout pickin it up but dont know how it'll go..

sorry for the hijack but didnt wanna open another thread bout same thing

anyone got any experiance?

Yep LOL there is personalised degrees of nice .

Confusion exists about "T66" and the back yard handle of 67 or GT67 . The T66 is a dinosaur by todays standards compared to the TO4R wheel (BCI-8D) . Unfortunately the Americans call many comp wheels by inducer diametre hence 67 ot GT67 for the 84mm 63Trim TO4R wheel . The "T66" wheel is larger at ~ 91 mm and smaller trim but not really equal performance .

Matter of opinion but I stand with the Garrett engineers - 30 series turbine and 40 series compressor is not a very smart combination . HKS chose to take a big comp trim drop with their exclusive GT3040 version ie 56T down to 50T . I can't believe this was done by accident .

As I've said before you could get a HKS smaller comp trim GT3040 and fit the larger GT35 turbine but its not a cheap exercise .

Cheers A .

oh ok. my bad. yeah the larger diameter of the t04r/t04z wheel is bigger . woops. and looks differant with what looks like semi machined leading blades.

I run a GT35 1.06 on an internally stock RB25DET and I love it. Sure it's laggy but running an auto fixes a lot of that and nitrous fixes the rest. For street duties I'm now seeing better fuel economy than my standard turbo as I can drive around off boost most of the time. That's with 740cc Nismo's as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...