Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeh so ive been trying to find a pod filter air box for months, have contacted, pm'd, called and emailed various people and companies but to no avail. I did find one type some one selling "pod enclosures" but it was a aluminium box that wrapped around the filter and i didnt think this woud be legal (was the size and shape of the filter). The main reason i want it is so that i can get away with 2 intake modifications. I have no idea why no one is making these.. Are there really THAT many more r33's/r34's than r32's on Australian roads? (besides the obvious, every wog in australia driving a R33, factor)

Any ways so if some one could point me towards someone, somewhere who knows something about pod boxes, id really appreciate it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133036-r32-gts-t-pod-filter-box/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Now call me crazy.. but I’ve got a wicked idea..

It’s just out of this world and I doubt anyone would ever think of it..

Here’s what you do..

You go and buy…

A STOCK R32 GTST AIR BOX.

Drill a 3 inch hole to the bottom of it.

Drill a 3 inch hole in the metal frame under the air box.

Buy some 3 inch PVC plumbing pipe from Bunnings and a few 45 and 90 degree bends and then put it all together so that it directs air from your front bar where intake for the stock intercooler used to sit, up to the fully sealed air box.

Put in a hi flow K&N panel filter.

How crazy is that idea?

Man I’m clever..

No-one would ever think to use the stock air box with a new air feed to it.

GTST... Whats that old saying. Great minds think alike. :P

I did this to mine some years ago.

Standard R32 Airbox.

100mm DIA hole in the bottom of it, 100mm dia hole in to the inner bumper air intake directly under the airbox.

2 x 45degree PVC pipe angles

One slips in to the other, one points slightly forward in to the airstream, the other points in to the airbox, you then trim the one that enters the airbox so that its nice and clean in the airbox.

It looks stock, paint it black modify the std cai and it can't be seen.

gtst- why do you always seem to have an annoyed tone whenever you post something up? nearly every post i can remember of yours its either some sort of sarcasm or bagging someone...

a good idea none the less though...

cheers. james.

hmmmm, wonder if i can jam a pod into my stock airbox =/

tryed that, didnt work lol

i am too in the same predicament.

wish i could find a 2nd had airbox tho, no-one has one and i aint hacking up a perfectly good one

so if anyone has a stock air-box, lemme know!

cheers

Unless its the stock box you wont get away with the 1 intake mod rule if you have a FMIC too, so custom is out of the picture.

Modding the stock box with a new feed is the best idea, especially if its underneath therefore cannot be really seen.

gtst- why do you always seem to have an annoyed tone whenever you post something up? nearly every post i can remember of yours its either some sort of sarcasm or bagging someone...

a good idea none the less though...

cheers. james.

funnily enough i said exactly the same thing a while ago.

Uhmm but most people seem to think a pod will not fit into the stock box :(

I dont mind if its not legal, most important thing is that they cant pick it up... It's a queer rule any way

Any one else know where u can purchase a box that will FIT A POD, in it?

thx;

Edited by r32 gts-turbo

Alternatively, just cut out the base of the stock airbox and hide a pod in there...i have an apexi power intake pod hidden in my stock airbox...looks 100% stock from the outside...and with the base of the box gone...you'll get heaps of airflow...and if u do head to a track or something...just pull the cover off and you good to go...

gtst- why do you always seem to have an annoyed tone whenever you post something up? nearly every post i can remember of yours its either some sort of sarcasm or bagging someone...

a good idea none the less though...

cheers. james.

LOL… few reasons.

1.) I’ve been here too long and see the same questions over and over and over.

2.) I’m sick of people asking for advice then not taking it when given and asking the question in another way.

3.) I’m just an angry old man who doesn’t have a tolerance for people who don’t listen and who don’t search.

Next we’ll see some thread asking how much power the stock air box can handle before a pod is required..

And guess what, that’s been answered/proven by many people on here from their own experience and cars.

Almost everyone has a pod filter.

Then almost everyone one of them have asked how to or where to get a heat shield for it.

Or how to get a box made for it.

I don’t understand how these people’s brains function.

A 7.3 second search on here for “AIR+BOX” or “POD+FILTER+BOX” will get a bunch of threads. It will have people posting their results or experience on them.

It will show you what power people are making with stock air boxes.

Any skyline owner.. especially the ones on this forum will know of the MINES R34 GTR.

Everyone of them would have seen the clip of “drift king” and others driving it around a track and how they are amazed at the power etc..

Everyone will see that the car still utilises the STOCK GTR AIR BOX. Yes it has a MINES intake snorkel to it but it is still a STOCK AIR BOX with a hi flow panel filter and aftermarket intake snorkel.

Everyone knows that car makes over 500hp.

So I have to question what makes people “THINK” they need to use a pod filter on their skylines with power levels of “MOSTLY” under 200rwkw.

Apart from making more sound, they do NOTHING for performance at these sort of power levels.

Car has stock air box, you buy a $80 panel filter and $10 worth of PVC piping and spend 1 hour cutting holes and putting it all together to make a duct to the air box.

Instead people spend $100 on a pod, $50 for an adapter to mount it to the AFM, then get sound and heat soaked intake air.

Then they go spend god knows how much for a patrician or air box made of carbon fibre or aluminium or white gold or something..

And STILL get worse results than the stock setup.

I was hoping that my SARCASTIC reply would make the person understand that it’s obvious what would yield the better result and cost less without calling him/her names.

That’s my cry for the day over.

Have a nice night.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...