Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as have been said, not a good idea.

some of the variables are-

different intercoolers flowing different amounts,

some fuel pumps are lazier than others

dirty airflow meters

lazy/dirty injectors

different motors having slightly different compression (due to wear)

just to new a few.

ok so we know not to copy but ide like to know other peoples settings just out of interest

well ill start my correction begins at 3500 and is pretty even increase till 5000 which has a correction of 10 then correction is 11 from 6000 onwards this is just from memory cant exactly remember the exact values at each load point

mods 11psi, fmic ,3in zorst ,camgear-3, pod+cai.

208.8rwkw

Mods

------

HKS Pod Filter

HKS Cat Back Exhaust

HKS EVC 5 boost controller @ 10 psi

Greddy Type R Blow Off Valve

Apexi SAFC-II

600x300x76 Autobahn88 Intercooler + fitting

Sard Fuel Pressure Regulator

Walbro 500hp Fuel Pump

This is mine

RPM Correction

4000 0%

4600 -1%

5200 -6%

5800 -10%

6400 -10%

7000 -10%

7600 -11%

Mods

------

HKS Pod Filter

HKS Cat Back Exhaust

HKS EVC 5 boost controller @ 10 psi

Greddy Type R Blow Off Valve

Apexi SAFC-II

600x300x76 Autobahn88 Intercooler + fitting

Sard Fuel Pressure Regulator

Walbro 500hp Fuel Pump

This is mine

RPM Correction

4000 0%

4600 -1%

5200 -6%

5800 -10%

6400 -10%

7000 -10%

7600 -11%

hey does that mean they only used 6 load points??? they did the same thing with my car, i dont think may shops know how to or dont bother to bunch up the load point so you have all 12 where you need them and not where you dont ie, load points sitting ther doing noting where correction is zero

Edited by otto
hey does that mean they only used 6 load points??? they did the same thing with my car, i dont think may shops know how to or dont bother to bunch up the load point so you have all 12 where you need them and not where you dont ie, load points sitting ther doing noting where correction is zero

from 4000rpm onwards was where is was getting way rich thats y they only corrected that area.

i dont know a lot about the safc myself i may get it tuned again at a later date at a place that knows the safc inside out.

because there is so much more you can do with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...