Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I've got an unusual problem here, my driver side rear wheel sits out from the guard and my passenger side rear sits inside where I think it should be, iof not a little too far inside the guard. This wasn't an issue before as there was a heap of negative camber (as a result of lowering the car) but that's not the problem and has been countered out by Whiteline Adjustable camber kits. This is definitly not a camber issue, of that I'm pretty sure. It almost looks as if the entire rear end has been pushed across 20mm or so. I've attached pics to illustrate... SydkeyKid... suspensions specialist please give me some ideas as to wtf is going on. For reference, I have access to most tools and workshops.

Going out of my mind!

Cheers

Problem Side

post-23873-1158395076.jpg

Seemingly Normal-ish Side

post-23873-1158395121.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134579-diffrear-end-location/
Share on other sites

Not sure, but I do know it was involved in a light front ender, there's a small crease near the headlight but we straightened it out no worries. This to me looks like drift damage almost, as in hit gutter and push rear end across but I'm no expert.

I haven't but this was evident before the wheels went on, the larger wheels make it easier to spot though. I think we can safely assume the car is not right/has been in an accident, I'm more interested in expert thoughts on how best to rectify it. If necessary I have access to a rack.

Edit: Just thought, there's no reason one of these wheels isn't the wrong offset, I'll check and I'll swap them over to rule that out. For now let's assume they are fine.

Edited by ActionDan

If it helps - I took some measurements comapring the passenger and drivers sides and in pretty much all cases on any given point to point measurement the drivers side is out 4cm's+. Quick example being center of diff drain plug to centre of tyre on each sde shows a few cm's discrepancy. I'm at a loss to explain this as nothing hums, vibrates, squeeks or otherwise complains. What I didn't measure and should have, is the diff centre to a point on the wheel hub assembly to rule out issues from the diff out, that'd also imply that the problem is from the wheel hub out maybe, say stub axle or something.

Ideas still appreciated guys.

If my understanding of toe is correct then I think that's unlikely as toe will allow changes to the wheel angle in regards to the axle angle, that is rather than being a 90 degree angle between wheel and axle, it could be changed. The problem we're talking about is the entire wheel sits further away from the diff than the other side. That is, something is bent which is pushing the wheel out or something is worn/damaged/misalinged and is not allowing the wheel to sit where it normall should. I've checked bushes under the car and none of them seem to show signs of lateral stress either.

I'm putting a mates car up on stands tonight and taking some donor measurements from his car whichi I'll cross reference with mine to try and isolate the problem. Hopefully this isolation will be enough such that it will be easy to ascertain what part(s) are at fault.

Cheers for the suggestion and if my understand of toe is incorrect please feel free to point that out and point out my misunderstanding if this could actually be the cause of the problem :blush:

My first guess would be a combination of toe and camber. So the first job is to get the alignment checked/adjusted.

The diiff is not in the centre of the car, so measuring from the diff to the wheels is useless. ie; the drive shafts are different lengths. If you want to check the rear cradle alignment then make sure that each of the 4 chassis studs is located in the middle of the subframe bushes. If not, then loosen the 4 nuts and move the subframe around till they are. A pinch bar or a really long screw driver usually does the job.

:P cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

I'm putting it up on stands tonight and comparing it with a mates car, I'm hoping it will reveal itself easily. I also have the car booked in at a suspension place first thing tomorrow morning, if it's toe and camber they should be able to tell.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Seems a bit extreme to be toe and camber though?

OK it;s been up on stands and I can clearly see the problem. It is clearly a toe/camber issue, thanks Maerlin and SK and everyone else you had ideas. The hicas rod is dialled right out on the dirver side, I compared to another 33 to be sure. This should be sorted tomorrow at the tyre place.

Gary can you please provide recommended settings so I have something to give the tyre place. My Car is at it's lowest and has both camber kits in the rear.

Cheers

Well after having the car in at a suspension place, they could not get it even close to under the guard, lots of investigation revealed a very small gap between the wheel hub assembly and the back of the brake dust cover, implying a small bend of some kind in the assembly. Replaced it and the stub axle and wheel bearing to be sure, problem is now gone. What bitch... Will put car back in to have rest of the alignment done and should be a cat on carpet once I finish it off with a sway bar up front.

Edited by ActionDan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 馃槂
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
  • Create New...