Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

iv got another problem with my gtr and it pissing me off!

ok iv searched and can find what im looking for, except the s13 below my tread has the same problem,

my car is running 15psi with the restictor out, and only has exhaust and 2 airpods.

the car runs fine for bout 20 mins and wont boost past 10psi, and also the bovs are going nuts sounds like there surginging un till i het 3000rpm, i no my afms are fine, tested them and have pretty similar volts.

can some please help me?? i would really aprectate it..

OK IF ANYONE CAN SOLVE THIS PROBLEM I WILL SHOUT A SLAB OF WHAT EVER U WANT.

C'MON GUYS SOMEONES GOTA NO

thx in advance

Edited by ali-turko
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134737-gtr-boosting-problem/
Share on other sites

hey guys

iv got another problem with my gtr and it pissing me off!

ok iv searched and can find what im looking for, except the s13 below my tread has the same problem,

my car is running 15psi with the restictor out, and only has exhaust and 2 airpods.

the car runs fine for bout 20 mins and wont boost past 10psi, and also the bovs are going nuts sounds like there surginging un till i het 3000rpm, i no my afms are fine, tested them and have pretty similar volts.

can some please help me?? i would really aprectate it..

thx in advance

^ Ive got the same problem same mods aswell. Im keen to find out to. :blush:

Are you AFM's maxing out? Could be boost cut at 15psi

The fact that it happens after 20 minutes suggests that its probably a vibration or heat issue rather than something like a broken hose or connector.

Are you running pods? are they supported by a bracket?

It could be the connector on the AFM's, the solder inside the afm is known to crack with vibration but seem fine at idle.

Just testing the voltage at idle isn't really a measure of how well your AFM's are working.

no sorry ive explained it wrong

compressor surging known and heard as "fluttler" when coming on boost is a result of the pressure in the manifold going past the compressors effiency, ie the compress map says in the best scenario it can flowing at best 16psi of compression, but for some reason the manifold pressure is say 18psi so the compressors surge resulting in vl turbo style flutter on boost, ie: the compressors are out of effeiency and surging / erractic operation / wobble

comrpessor chuffing is usually caused by aftermarket pods and piping kits to the stock turbo's. basically the air reverbates and chops past the airflow meter, so it runs like a bitch. this is common with say 2530s and custom piping and pods. not very common on stockers i dont think, but certainly possible

and also it mat not do it for couple of days and then suddenly it will come back, iv also re-solder the afms, and plug one of those ecu data things in and the afms seemed to be fine, but i no my rear 02 sensor is stuffed and will b replacng asap!

my advice would be to drop the restictor or whatever you have done and go back to direct actuator mode, that is stock boost. that way it should be a clean slate. then if you can replicate the problem then something is wrong with turbo setup or intake.

if #1

compress surging, try lowering the boost, see if that helps

the compressors shouldnt surge under normal conditions

could indicate compressor failure, out of balanace or chopped wheels

again assuming the same problem occurs on say stock boost

if #2

try seperating the pods or putting a shitload of pipework between one of them or both them, try like some good sized pool shop vacuum hose for one of both of the pods, try bending the pods intake pipes. anything to alter the intake path of air to the compressor inlet snout

again this is only what i think, it doesnt mean im write or correct at all

umm i use to have the hks pod filters with different adaptters and still had the same problem, i dont have the resrictor coz as the car came with out one,

but what i understand is y dose go away after i restart the car for a few seconds?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...