Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah 301 not bad for a gtr-s turbs/daily driver..

i called up the badge co try get more they have closed down..

spewin cuz i know ima get badged one day soon..

yeah, ima get a couple of badges, im sure there are gts ppl out there and as soon as they see these badges will run right over :laugh:... same about the place closing down.. yeah 301 not bad at all. alot of quality hks stuff in there, love hks!!.. i have a pic of this car in a mag, ill try scan it and see what i come up with.

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

shouldn't be long now fella's spoke to them today and the materials for the prototypes have come in ... so they will probally get done as soon as tomorrow :) ...

fingers crossed!

Might be a bit too late but will throw my idea in for kicks :P

Why cant the design be different to the GTR? Regardless if it will be GTS OR GTT it still mimicks the GTR and may not be spotted from afar as others have mentioned.

Here is a quick 5min job of maybe a whole new design for a badge :)

post-10032-1163149969.jpg

post-10032-1163151093.jpg post-10032-1163161463.jpg

If someone could pass me the .PSD it will be easier to play around with :cheers:

should be easy enough to get a sticker of the GTS. Was thinking it would be placed on the top right corner of the bootlid, just above the rear light. Just need a proper image file :P

If someone could pass me the .PSD it will be easier to play around with :huh:

The raw artwork is an illustrator file not photoshop and I'm sorry but handing over the artwork is like asking the FBI to handover the xfiles...LOL!

i quite like rekins top design, the one with the larger T. maybe make the 'gts bit white instead of grey for a bit of contrast

post-10032-1163339230.jpg

haha i dunno, these are just some poor chopping examples. Darkboy should be able to pump out some pro looking ones ;)

i think we should stick with what we know should come out nice and what we know will look good on our cars. those ones with the big t look nice, but what will they look like on?, looks good with the black background, but things may change once its off that?, im likem the original idea

hey guys

still waiting on the prototype ... the people making them are really busy but they assure me it won't be long now =)

Gday Mate,

Hows things going?

We looking at a prototype yet?

R33

Hey Everyone,

I bet by now your all feeling pretty angst about these badges getting made.

I've been having troubles with the company producing them but they assure me it wont be long. I didn't realise the complications of having an outside job done :teehee:.

I promise to get this prototype made asap. (and i'll be really pissed if it takes this long and turns out shit)

Thanks for your patience,

Chris :laugh:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...