Jump to content
SAU Community

Rda Rotors Group Buy - The Next Generation


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Great to hear guys... anyone from 3rd batch who has not received their rotors by this friday let me know via this thread or pm and I will follow up with RDA.

There were 3 people who misses out the 3rd batch as the transfer went in late but your orders has been submitted yesterday afternoon and RDA will ship them out today:

- JSWR32 (R32 GTR front 7926G)

- Leech (R33 GTSt rear 908S)

- NRB (R32 GTR front 7926G)

hey rianto

pmed you the other day. i was in the first group buy for the rotors. just wondering if its possible to get rotors for a honda accord? nothing fancy just plain rotors. got quoted $400 just for the rears by repco. even if i cant, even a 10% discount or something? if your too busy to ask for me im happy to enquire just need a number to call.

thanks jason.

They did it on purpose as of not to disclose the special price only available on SAU forum. Otherwise they will have issues with their big customers ringing up unhappy because they can't beat our prices.

Regarding how they balance their book, it's their internal thing to sort out. :teehee:

I am unable to open the zip its saying its corrupted

can you please pm me a quote for R32gts4 front slotted discs think they are the same as R32gtst type M discs or 280mm

Regards, mike

Hi Guys,

Just for "quality control" check do any of you from the following batches have not received your rotors?

3RD BATCH

- Paragon

- turbo87

- pssht

- GTshortie

- Will20b

4TH BATCH

- JSWR32

- Leech

Can you pls confirm whenever it's convenient...

Can you please double check with RDA on the rotors for the R34GTT; I was in contact with a local distributor yesterday and they said there is a part available for them.

Thanks

As per my correpsondence with RDA all these times the only ones we have for R34 GT-T is rear rotors which is the same as R33's

Do you have an exact Part No and rotor dimension, that might help a lot.

Hi, maybe in a week or 2. Right now I'm too flat out at work. Office caught fire, with me the only one working on weekends and single handedly fight the fire till the brigade arrived, jobs were delayed, so lotsa sh1t happening this week...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...