Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is why I don't catch buses, and hate driving anywhere near them.

What to do with a bus driver who has had 69 accidents in six years of driving? His union wants him reinstated; the Transport Minister wants to know why he got so many chances.

Victor Miguel, a bus driver since 2000, was dismissed by State Transit after a August 31 report found that, despite being re-trained six times, he continued to have accidents, according to Channel Nine.

In one trip, an undercover State Transit employee found Mr Miguel allegedly ran a red light, tail-gated other vehicles and stopped and accelerated suddenly.

Source: SMH

This is why I don't catch buses, and hate driving anywhere near them.

Source: SMH

To be fair this is 1 driver out of 2500 STA drivers - kind of like saying all Skyline drivers are hoons becasue one got caught doing 100 in a school zone dont you think?

I've seen some farkin atrocious bus drivers. At least a couple of times a week I see them nearly run into someone, though given that I live not far from a depot I probably see a disproportionate amount of buses, and given the driving displayed by nearly everyone else in this area (Toowong) they are probably just trying to fit in :(

That said, the vast majority of the time they're not too bad. The only thing they're guilty of most of the time is using the "give way to buses when pulling away from the kerb" rule as an excuse to barge into traffic without checking if someone is already half way past them, and cutting people off.

Anyway, in the example given above, there is no way in hell I would give that guy his job back. Surely even the unions can see that he should not be behind the wheel of a bus?

I have been catching Sydney buses for a while and most of them are very skillful drivers. I was on a bus once though, and the bus had it's mirror taken off. I am sure the driver did it deliberately cos he didn't want to drive because he just immediately kicked us all off the bus and I was up the front watching him. Another time the same thing happened the driver stopped, radioed in and wrote a little note. Took him all of about 4 minutes and we were back on the way.

That said, my uncle drove trams in melbourne. 13 accidents in 7 years.

Thats because when all you northerners come down here you all dont know how to do hook turns

what sort of f**k wit came up with hook turns? i'm a northerner and i only know the basics of them. i think you southern people need to get some more warm weather. the cold is affecting your brains, LOL.

that is a typical union point of view. so what if the guy has had 50 million accidents. the union wouldn't care if the guy raped little girls, as long as he paid his union fee's they'd stand up for him.

the unions are ruining small business. i run a small business, and workers have more rights than i do. if i have a part time employee, after 6 months the law said i had to put them onto full time, whether i could afford to or not.

that is a typical union point of view. so what if the guy has had 50 million accidents. the union wouldn't care if the guy raped little girls, as long as he paid his union fee's they'd stand up for him.

That was my biggest issue with what was in the article.

"We have to defend him", they say. My first thought was, "Yeah.....f**k using our heads and doing the right thing...we've got an agenda to follow and that doesn't require us to be reasonable".

The unions could have found him another job, doing something else. Maybe a desk job where the only thing he can crash is his computer (you shouldn't be fired for crashing your Windows PC 10 times a year, since it'll crash more times by itself) or something that stops him doing something he's clearly not capable of doing, and risking people's lives in the process.

To be fair this is 1 driver out of 2500 STA drivers - kind of like saying all Skyline drivers are hoons because one got caught doing 100 in a school zone dont you think?

Good point, but hoons generally don't have the lives of 40+ people in their hands at any given time.

Personally, I think that anyone who has more than one "at fault" accident over a 12 month period obviously can't drive, and should have their licence taken away.

Good point, but hoons generally don't have the lives of 40+ people in their hands at any given time.

Personally, I think that anyone who has more than one "at fault" accident over a 12 month period obviously can't drive, and should have their licence taken away.

That'd be unfair though, I've had one at fault (unclaimed) because the dipshit slammed his brakes on in the wet at a green light. His stopping power was just greater than mine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The incentives are mostly the same, yes. Ethanol is cheap compared to the cost of doing 98-100 RON with crude oil alone. 87 to 93-94 AKI all with E10. In 2020 Canada mandated E10 as a part of their "renewable fuel standard" and is supposedly going to go to E15 in 2030. In California where there are only 8 refineries with two threatening to shut down next year it's been over 20 years now of E10 and 91 AKI maximum because there's just not enough refinery capacity or crude oil supply relative to the demand for premium unleaded fuel. And CARB's low carbon fuel standard means functionally none of the diesel available at the pump is made from crude oil anymore. It's almost all entirely 20% biodiesel blended with 80% renewable diesel (hydrotreated vegetable oil) now. The number of gasoline vehicles that support E15 or higher ethanol concentrations is surprisingly low, I can't imagine it being wise to play tricks like this without flex fuel sensors in most of the fleet.
    • It's almost certainly the same as the one next to it. Have a fish around amongst these hits https://www.google.com/search?q=surface+mount+transistor+m33&sca_esv=9cb49794e0b2005d&source=hp&ei=2vJ5aNjTB7Kw0PEPldnS8QM&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaHoA6qkfmF6XcygtrZ4Vu9f92NXF_RFd&ved=0ahUKEwjYqIPP7MWOAxUyGDQIHZWsND4Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=surface+mount+transistor+m33&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhxzdXJmYWNlIG1vdW50IHRyYW5zaXN0b3IgbTMzMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjKCFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAHfAaAB3wGqAQMyLTG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgGgAuYBmAMAkgcDMi0xoAfMBLIHAzItMbgH5gHCBwMyLTHIBwU&sclient=gws-wiz
    • South Australia, which is hardly as far behind as the rest pf Oz makes out, and who is also not a paragon of progressiveness (read that as over-legislation) in the area of vehicle standards, has this to say on the subject: Adjustable coil-over suspension Aftermarket adjustable coil-over suspension components are suspension units that incorporate an external thread on the main body and corresponding threaded spring saddle that allows the vehicle's suspension height to be varied. If fitting aftermarket or coil-over suspension components you must submit an Application to modify a light motor vehicle form and a report from a light vehicle engineering signatory (LVES).
    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
×
×
  • Create New...