Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes....for sure...u could just feel the diff......the 1st day u reset it....the ECU re-map at highest preformance.during leaning...& later on...it keep changing until it go the best setting. It may be a little bit diff than the 1st drive but I could say it MUST be better than B4....easier to start.....better acce respon...fuel consumption.......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13711-ecu-reset/#findComment-274735
Share on other sites

hey guys here is caption from skylines downunder to doin it the ole 1,2,3 step, to better performance and fuel economy.........and yes they both work as i have done both steps and it is all good!

ECU Reset:

This is a very good procedure to follow, especially after making any changes to the car, for example after fitting a new exhaust, or air filter, or just every couple of months as part of a service routine.

To reset the ECU, disconnect your car's battery for 24 hours. This will reset the ECU to the factory defaults.

I have also heard that this can be done more quickly by disconnecting the battery and pressing the brake pedal (discharging any residual power in the car's electrical system), and then reconnecting the battery.

- It has been recently posted that this technique can help if done prior to a run down a drag strip, with a fuel tank of octane boosted petrol or #1 racing fuel.

- Apparently when the car is started for the very first time, the factory ECU advances the timing by about two degrees, and monitors the knock sensor. If any detonation is detected, the ECU will retard the timing by three degrees. It will continue advancing and retarding by progressively smaller increments. After a time, the ECU is doing the advance / retard by only tenths of a degree, and any power gains resulting from a tank of #1 racing fuel for example will take a long time to show, and not be noticeable. Resetting the ECU will cause the ECU to very quickly re-map the ignition curves when the car is restarted. The poster advises disconnecting the battery, pressing the brake pedal, and reconnecting the battery prior to staging.

A number of Skylines Downunder Club members have done this to their Skylines with good results. One friend reports a smoother drive, and more free revving. First impressions on it car is that it starts quicker (not that it ever cranked for more than a second or two), feels smoother in the low rev range, and seems to have a little more torque in low speed acceleration. Possibly better fuel economy also. It pays to reset after each modification to the vehicle, or soon after purchase to begin with...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13711-ecu-reset/#findComment-279103
Share on other sites

You can reset your ECU by: under the dash near the fuse box there is a grey plug. Theres two wires all by them selves. While the cars ignition is on short the two wires out for 2 seconds. This goes into diagnostic mode. You will see the check engine light flash. It should flash 5 times quickly and 5 times slowly consecutively, this means your car is all OK. By doing this it also resets your ECU and without all the problems like alarm, reseting clocks and radios.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13711-ecu-reset/#findComment-288123
Share on other sites

ah icic

oh and i can't seem to find the visual led display on the ecu

i manage to remove the kick plate(a big bitch of a job cos it feels like you almost break the damn thing)

and i pulled out the ecu

and only thing i see on it is the lil idle control thingy and next to it a small oval hole with clear film covering it. is that supposed to be the led display? cos i dun see any lights showing. or is it the leds inside the box? do i have to take apart the plates cos that can be a bitch with the loom cable in the way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13711-ecu-reset/#findComment-288523
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...