Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its TYPE-M DOOOOOOOD, you have just set yourself up for some serious flamming, so Ill start it lol.

All r33s are type-m and you r refering to a series 2, they have different bonnet headlights and frontbar.

lol my bad..that's why ppl come over here to be educated rite ? =)

i guess i will take the flaming as part and parcel of being in the community

anywayz, thanks for ur last sentence...know i now wat to get for a Type-M front

thanks

chock

Edited by chock

R33S2 - I think he is referring to getting his S1 to look like a R33 S1 with the Mspec bumper and side skirts. Not a Series 2. I know ppl say all R33's are Type M but a lot of car dealers/importers refer to a Series 1 M-spec as the version that came with the sideskirts and different front bar from factory

The dealers would be wrong. I've been saying this for ages. People on the forumn have only started realising it after the r34 gtr Mspec came out.

There is no such thing as r33 gtst m spec. Jspec also calls it the wrong thing. It's Type-m.

It's just like do you call an integra R spec?

I was looking to do this on my r33 but i cant find a secondhand "M-Spec" (haha just to annoy Manwhore) front bar in good condition and reasonable price in WA. Carmate sells a replica on their website though. Pretty sure you dont have to change the headlights

so...the help guys?

lolz...u know the series where the front bar looks hell lot "Fiercer" than the current GTS-T S1...

was wondering if anyone did it..and whoever did it...how much ...

chock

Maybe this is what you meant?

This was the bar that came on my car when I bought it (non type m)

post-29425-1160220171.jpg

& this was a type m I put on my car

post-29425-1160220496.jpg

The bar cost me $150 from a guy I met on this forum & it cost me $350 to get it painted, probably only $200 without the two-tone paint.

The bar looks great & you can't tell the difference in colour where the bar meets with the guards.

Hope it helped :)

Ladies and Gentlemen...

we got a winner..thanks so much Yo-yo..

a pic says a thousand words..2 pics 2 thousands words =)

thanks..the price..is not too shabby too...so wif the front bar..there's space for an aftermarket intercooler and all?

chock

Ladies and Gentlemen...

we got a winner..thanks so much Yo-yo..

a pic says a thousand words..2 pics 2 thousands words =)

thanks..the price..is not too shabby too...so wif the front bar..there's space for an aftermarket intercooler and all?

chock

No worries mate,

I was planning on a front mount but now I'm not going to bother as I am trading up to an r34.

I've been told the type m bar needs to be slightly modified to fit a front mount. Apparently they need to cut out the middle part that holds the licence plate... but that's also where most of the bar is fitted to the front reo bar :whistling:

Maybe somebody on these forums has done it before & can shed some light on this.

Edited by Yo-Yo

just so you know, all turbo r33's are type m, except for some of the auto's. i had what is refered to as a non type m bar on my car, but according to FAST my car is a type m. i think it depends on whether the car has ever been in a crash. the non type m bar is actually the sedan front bar.

just so you know, all turbo r33's are type m, except for some of the auto's. i had what is refered to as a non type m bar on my car, but according to FAST my car is a type m. i think it depends on whether the car has ever been in a crash. the non type m bar is actually the sedan front bar.

Are you 100% sure that it is the sedan front bar? I dont think this is true. Then what about the side skirts and rear pods? And ive also seen pics from old Nissan advertisements of the coupes with this front bar. Also a number of websites claim that the R33 GTST came out with a number of bodykits, lights etc. Its just like how ppl reckon only 95 onwards came with drivers airbag, however mine is a 94 and has an airbag.

And Im NOT saying that all turbo r33's arent type m

drivers airbag was optional on pre 95 model r33s. as were sideskirts.

the r32's had differences between the type m and the standard gts-t such as leather gear boot and handrake cover, leather steering wheel and bigger brakes. all of these features are standard on all of the r33 gtst's.

the only other reason for the different front bars i have found was that there was an optional front bar for gtst's.

for a list of models go here http://imports.motortraders.net/imports/se...p;model=Skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...