Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

thing is.. according to the dyno graph, it only runs lean up top, and by then its already made most of its power...

so its power isn't really coming from the fact that its running lean...

in other words, the rb20 is makign power for another reason. because its just in really good condition? possibly..

rb20 ftw!!!!!!!!!!

where's Roy? he'll jump in here soon for some rb20 lovin :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2566222
Share on other sites

Yeah im going to get a new Fuel Pump very soon. Then finish the zorst off with a 3 inch Front/Dump pipe and Hi Flow Cat. Raise the boost to 14psi and get a tune. Should be sweet then :D

Thats pretty good Matty boy! Now take it down the drags :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2566235
Share on other sites

Yea well im so glad to see a rb20 with those results. I own a rb20 my self and have basic mods and bout a power fc and one of those turbotech BC try it out and get it dyno'd.. but yea i dont think i will get those results ill post them up. i think your one of those guys with freak engins. lucky c**t.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2567426
Share on other sites

Yeah it is running lean but the power is still up there before it starts running lean...

I might get some new tyres next week and take it down the 1/4 Mile :)

MATT nice work and it does look at 150km's you hit the limit of the fuel pump, BUT there is a posible little thing you can do to help will the fuel pump until you can replace it. That is to run a good heavy gauge power supply wire to your fuel pump as the standard system normally has to much volt drop across it (meaning your not getting full 14v charge volts to the pump) you can use the exist power system to switch a relay controlling the heavy gauge if you like and also ground the pump well. This is not a total solution but can offen gain quiet abit of exa performance out of the exist pump and will definitely help went the new pump going in. (voltage to torque ratio is a square root relationship meaning a little voltage drop will lose a lot of torque).

As for be lean BS running 12:1 through the majority of the power range is great and safe, and at only 12psi you could quiet easily run leaner without a problem. The only problem is the lean out trend at the end as you have already identified.

pete

ps i run 12:1 at 500 to 530rwhp for 2 years at 18 to 20psi no problems.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2567674
Share on other sites

Nice result! I pulled 195.4rwkw in my 32 and thought I was doing well... but you don't even have a fuel pump or tuned ecu!! Must be happy about that.

yeap, and you must be happy about the wanker dyno operator giving you bullshit figures.

Unless your factory ECU has been remapped, and the turbo either high flowed or replaced with a RB25 turbo, then your figure is bullshit.

I bet any of these "figures" are barely able to pull over 100mph down the quarter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2570522
Share on other sites

ok matt is running an r34 steel wheel turbo and i was there it did pull that power and have been in the car and it feels as quick as mine, i have an r32 with an rb25 making 197 rwkw. i have no doubt that the dyno is reading correct

It was also run at the pole position dyno day so i doubt they mucked the figure up when my car was run before matt and a soarer ran after matt and power figures for both my car and the soarer were around what they expected.

Edited by kamakazi
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2570603
Share on other sites

yeap, and you must be happy about the wanker dyno operator giving you bullshit figures.

Unless your factory ECU has been remapped, and the turbo either high flowed or replaced with a RB25 turbo, then your figure is bullshit.

I bet any of these "figures" are barely able to pull over 100mph down the quarter.

Mafia it sounds like your really f**ken Jealous of my RB20! Just becasue your RB25 wont produce that much power on those mods doesnt mean you have to have a cry!

And if you actually READ! I wrote that I have a R34 Turbo!! How about you put up your Dyno reading and your Mods and lets see what you get?

Edited by r32matt
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2570670
Share on other sites

Thats an awesome result. Must be a relatively fresh engine. My question is how much difference in power output could there be between a fresh engine and an engine thats starting to get tired? In fact i started a thread about it!

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=138087

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2570995
Share on other sites

Your questioning Hyperdrive's (im guessin as its in Malaga) dyno??

It use's shootout mode and is known as a very realistic dyno, doesn't read high at all dude.

Its well known that shootout mode applies some exceptionally poor correction making results higher than they should be.

demit, how come i get 167, with more mods, on 14 psi, on a engine that so many people have told me is in really good nick.

because yours is realistic dude :)

I'd reckon you both would run extremely similar times down the track...

And same dyno same day, you'd both have power figures close to each other :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2571022
Share on other sites

Mafia it sounds like your really f**ken Jealous of my RB20! Just becasue your RB25 wont produce that much power on those mods doesnt mean you have to have a cry! Did you want a tissue?

And if you actually READ! I wrote that I have a R34 Turbo!! How about you put up your Dyno reading and your Mods and lets see what you get?

Im going to the drags very soon and when I get my quarter mile time it will give you something else to cry about!!!

He isnt having a cry about anything and he actually owns a rather quick car and knows what you need to do to achieve that sort of power... He is being realisitcs considering your modifications. So either there is more there that you are unaware about or its possible the reading is incorrect.

Edited by fEkuaR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137660-dyno-run/page/2/#findComment-2571087
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...