Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys.. I got an r32 skyline,

Noticed yesterday car wasnt very as powerful as it has been (in the last couple of weeks). Im pretty sure I have a boost leak somewhere but im just after the stock boost level of a r32 gtst. On the stock gauge it reads about 5 and then dips down to 4.5 or 4psi.. im dead set it usually runs about 7.5

Anyone with any ideas please let me know.

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137726-stock-r32-boost-levels/
Share on other sites

dont go too much boost, turbo will chuck a hissy fit lol :)

Mine was fine on 16psi for quite some time. Still is fine now; it has a little to do with luck of the draw, and how well the motor has been tuned with regards to NO detonation, mixtures are not lean and most importantly how hard its driven.

Mine was fine on 16psi for quite some time. Still is fine now; it has a little to do with luck of the draw, and how well the motor has been tuned with regards to NO detonation, mixtures are not lean and most importantly how hard its driven.

Yeah its strange how some people say its crazy to boost a R32 turbo over 12 psi but I know of one guy whose been running his stock turbo on 18psi since he imported the car 5 years ago and it hasnt missed a beat once!

slightly off topic, i've been running my 33 at 14psi on the stock turbo for a few months now. haven't had any issues. people say they lose power after 12psi due to the turbo being out of its efficiency range, but 14psi feels faster than 12. i put it down to about 11psi for a few weeks, and it just felt dead.

slightly off topic, i've been running my 33 at 14psi on the stock turbo for a few months now. haven't had any issues. people say they lose power after 12psi due to the turbo being out of its efficiency range, but 14psi feels faster than 12. i put it down to about 11psi for a few weeks, and it just felt dead.

Yeah I know what you mean my car made 166 RWKW on 14 PSI but Unigroup put it up to 18 to see how much more power it would make and it made close to 180 RWKW. (stock turbo)

slightly off topic, i've been running my 33 at 14psi on the stock turbo for a few months now. haven't had any issues. people say they lose power after 12psi due to the turbo being out of its efficiency range, but 14psi feels faster than 12. i put it down to about 11psi for a few weeks, and it just felt dead.

I think what people mean is top end peak power doesn't increase much past 12psi.

The gains to be had by upping boost are through the mid range which essentially accelerates you quicker to the peak power. So.. the car feels quicker. :wave:

I think what people mean is top end peak power doesn't increase much past 12psi.

The gains to be had by upping boost are through the mid range which essentially accelerates you quicker to the peak power. So.. the car feels quicker.

if i only fang it up through the gears at high rpm it feels great. i think the problem is that so many people hear that it is bad to run them at high boost that they never do, then just tell everyone that they don't go any better without ever trying it themselves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...