Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi ppls,

my R34 GT-T had its first dyno last week. Im pretty happy my tuner managed to squeeze 194rwkw out of it at 14psi on the std turbo, virtually on the limit. I think he managed to do it coz the engine n turbo is in good knick. Wot do u guys think from the dyno graphs? A/F ratios still safe? Knocks were between 13-20 during the tune i was told, i only give it a squirt now n again, its not a track car as yet, i noticed that knocks were around 15 usually.

Mods - Power FC & boost controller, turbobak with split, FMIC, pod, BOV, plugs gapped at 0.7.

Any comments welcome.

Cheers.

R34_dyno_AFR.pdf

R34_dyno_Boost.pdf

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138152-my-34s-first-dyno/
Share on other sites

at 14 psi, well not sure why but i have an R33 with 73k on the odo, with same mods and i managed 187rwKw at 10.2 psi.

Seams low, but the stock turbo is only good for 12 psi, after that it just pushes more hot air in, as it is ineficient.

My map however looks more like this.

Well done.

post-27760-1160523173.jpg

Is it just my eyes or is that a VERY rough power curve? Why is it all over the place, especially with a PFC installed? Even stock ECU power curves look more "even" than that.

Won't comment on the power figure, it's believable.

Seams low, but the stock turbo is only good for 12 psi, after that it just pushes more hot air in, as it is ineficient.

have you ever tested this, or are just saying it because everyone else does? i have the stock r33 turbo running at 14psi, and it is noticably better than 12psi, which i used to run it at. i'm putting it on a dyno in a few weeks time so i'll be able to do before and after runs.

Yes i have, well i have looked at the stock Turbo maps, the turbo will definatly go better at 14 psi, it still flows more air, but it drops almost 36% in efficiency. So you are getting hotter air at 14 psi with lower efficiency, meaning that the turbo has to work harder, hence shortining the life span.

the gain form 12 to 14 psi will be marginal unless you have a very good intercooler.

Having said all that, i don't think anyone has done any dyno runs so this would be great. see what you get.

Forget the whole hot air thing. 12-12.5 psi on the street I think is safe. The fact is that if you run 14psi all the time you will have to be very lucky for the turbo to live long.

Just because your grandma smoked a pack a day and lived to 90 doesn't mean that millions didn't die of lung cancer. No one gives a f**k about the odd one that survives. We just say congratulations, you are rare.

Power is good.

I think the curve is rough because they are both single runs. Dyno operators often print an average run which smooths it out. Also, when you have under 200rwkw you have a higher reolution on the page compared to someone with another 50-100-200 more.

It seems looking at the power flattening and even dipping late in the rev range on the high boost setting that you have a restriction in either the intake or exhaust or both. This is confirmed by the boost dropping off. Are you still running the stock cat? I guess it could also be a crap boost controller. The stock actuator should have no problems holding that amount of boost.

have you ever tested this, or are just saying it because everyone else does? i have the stock r33 turbo running at 14psi, and it is noticably better than 12psi, which i used to run it at. i'm putting it on a dyno in a few weeks time so i'll be able to do before and after runs.

I know what you mean any more than about 11psi in mine and I seem to loose top end, mid range increases but I defently loose top end.

10-12 psi max for dayly driving if you plan a mountain run or a track day 10psi is the max id go.

My R33 made 195.6rwkw at 10psi, dyno dynamatics, shootout mode at ICE performance. Similar mods but I have SAFC instead of power FC

cheers

I'd be asking for a refund on the tune... its pretty average mate.

Certainly needs a bit of work.

The power curve should be smooth, and this would reflect smooth power delivery... you graph is all over the place.

And back it off to 12psi, otherwise you risk it dying.

Some do, some dont... so its your own gamble :ninja:

I'd be asking for a refund on the tune... its pretty average mate.

Certainly needs a bit of work.

The power curve should be smooth, and this would reflect smooth power delivery... you graph is all over the place.

And back it off to 12psi, otherwise you risk it dying.

Some do, some dont... so its your own gamble :laugh:

i agree with what r31nismoid said.

OMG WE ACTUALLY AGREE...yay now im going to the pub to get trashed....

cheers.

i agree. Your power curve is very erratic. The curve is what you'd expect from a std ecu. not a pfc. Put the boost down a little, an if the pfc is tuned properly then you will get more power, and more importantly a smooth power curve, hence a smoother and better power delivery which you will notice on the road.

Also i feel it is too rich at 11.2:1. Try and get it closer to 12:1.

Forget the whole hot air thing. 12-12.5 psi on the street I think is safe. The fact is that if you run 14psi all the time you will have to be very lucky for the turbo to live long.

Just because your grandma smoked a pack a day and lived to 90 doesn't mean that millions didn't die of lung cancer. No one gives a f**k about the odd one that survives. We just say congratulations, you are rare.

Power is good.

I think the curve is rough because they are both single runs. Dyno operators often print an average run which smooths it out. Also, when you have under 200rwkw you have a higher reolution on the page compared to someone with another 50-100-200 more.

It seems looking at the power flattening and even dipping late in the rev range on the high boost setting that you have a restriction in either the intake or exhaust or both. This is confirmed by the boost dropping off. Are you still running the stock cat? I guess it could also be a crap boost controller. The stock actuator should have no problems holding that amount of boost.

Could my power curve be rough becoz they r individual runs like Abo Bob mentioned? Are those smooth graphs u guys posted a average power run? Just wondering?? Abo Bob - im running BATMBL's 5" body cat so i wouldn't have thought that it was a restriction, also have BATMBL's split dump & a Blitz NUR catback so i would have thought there should be minimal restrictions there. Boost Ctrl is the Apexi Power FC EBC, wouldn't have thought that was crap either. I can't think of wot else could be restricting it :laugh:

Also does anyone have any idea wot the lower graph with Lb on the right vertical axis reads? I thought it was torque at first but after converting Ft Lb(assuming thats wot it is) to Nm, it cant be torque.

R34_dyno_Boost.pdf

Well, you have to take into account that the stock turbo is running out of puff.

it wont hold much more than 12 psi up top when tuned as it simply isn't big enough too.

Torque can be either in foot/pounds or kilograms/centimeter.

Mate; my friend's R34GTT in AUTO with nothing but a Std ECU ran 194rwkw and the curve was A LOT smoother than yours :laugh:

Glad that my immediate reaction from seeing your graph is shared by a few others.

You have a PFC; your graph should be smooth as all hell!

Could my power curve be rough becoz they r individual runs like Abo Bob mentioned? Are those smooth graphs u guys posted a average power run? Just wondering??

Nope.

I've never seen someone "average" runs and print that out.

Not saying its not possible... But your run is all over the place which is basically a poor tune

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...