Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im looking at buying a non turbo r34 tiptronic coupe.. my budget is 19 000 and ive found a few that fall under this category... i just wanted to know, ive found to similar skylines that i like, 1 is red with a spoiler, the other is gun metal grey with no spoiler.. i rather the gun metal colour.. the thing is that the red one is a 2000 model and the grey one is 1998 model.. can anyone tell me the main differences between the year models? both are 19000.. thanks alot for any help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140423-whats-the-difference-between/
Share on other sites

Minor things like interior trim and LED colour behind the instruments, black instead of silver steering wheel paddles etc etc. All the differences are much of a muchness really. Just that you may feel more comfortable knowing you've got a newer model. No performance difference at all.

not really, i have an automatic license, embarasing, but i have no manual cars in my family to learn on.. and i seriously do not want to do the Ps test again.. my firt option was to go 5 speed, leanr on it get my ps again in manual, but after talking to my mate at KRT who bulids nissan race gearboxes, he reccomended the tiptronic, as he can do shift kit for me or even a full manual valve body...i do majority city driving so im guessing tip tronic has the pros of the manual car, and leaves the con of having to clutch all the time..?

If deep deep deep down you would rather just have two pedals that's your choice. But if you want the whole experience and want to use the car to its full potential and have a whole lot more fun, get the manual, learn on it, then get your P's. I got my auto license first..Because those P-plate laws crushed me wanting to get a skyline. After a while auto got boring and I was back into lines regardless of it being non-turb. Looked around for a manual line, got it, learnt manual in 2 weeks and got my P's that final day. It's a pain in the ass to learn, but once you get it ( under a week ) you're set.

Sorry to be bit realistic;/pain but if you don't have Manual license then do not buy Auto SKYLINE.

Make sure you buy Manual skyline... What ever the cost!

you will regret buying auto, trust me go and get your self manual license

IMHO

Joey

aggree'd, i went from a manual skyline to an auto skyline and its horrible...

they obviusly have less power, but mine pulls just as hard if not harder than my old one (and its 100kg heavier, just a tidier engine), your getting the same acceleration, but its jst f**king boring, you lose the thrill, etc esp from the taller gearing...

i find myself manual shifting constantly, and cracking the shits when the stupid f**king auto shifts into o/d at like 60kmph up a hill, so then i stomp it, shifts back to first & 5500rpm etc.

it makes you want to abuse your car, i find it frustrating.

needless to say, my auto tranny is shagged, she's getting a manual conversion, but if im going to go to the effort, she's going be be done properly (HD Clutch, Lightened f/w, single piece tailshaft, etc)

You will regret it, dont start out on auto's, start out on manuals and then if you dont like them switch back. Its not hard to do your manual test (dont know about up there though) its just like a 15 min test where you drive around casually, find a hill, do a hill start and find a car to do a reverse park on, too easy.

If you've got heaps of driving experience and are confident on the road, once you learn a manual you should ace it.

Depends on your needs. Obviously manual gives better performance when thrashing the car, but some people seriously DO need an auto if they drive to and from work in gridlock everyday.

Drive both then decide, I personally reckon the R34 tiptronic is a pretty decent system, shifts faster than most other tiptronics out there....but any auto skylines without tiptronic ie <R34s, I wouldn't bother with.

Edited by R34 Rampage

nah i wouldnt even consider a standard auto.. deff has to be tip tronic.. and will prob get a stage 2 shift kit from my mate at KRT race transmitions.. can anyone whos driven the tip tronic r34 tell me, do they have rev limiters? like do they get to a certain point where the computer automaticly changes for you ?

Well the whole point of triptronic is so you're in control when you put it in that flippy mode.. I don't see why it would change for you, that would kind of defeat the purpose.

Just get the manual.. Buy it.. learn.. P's in under a week. I'll teach you haha

i just went to an import dealership, looked at a few non turbo lines.. they have a 5 speed coupe there, they guy said it has a racing chip in it.. he said its 10% of the turbo?? no actual figures as it hasnt been dyno'd, does this sound reasonable? 10% of turbo with a racing chip? he said they can only be inported from japan

i just went to an import dealership, looked at a few non turbo lines.. they have a 5 speed coupe there, they guy said it has a racing chip in it.. he said its 10% of the turbo?? no actual figures as it hasnt been dyno'd, does this sound reasonable? 10% of turbo with a racing chip? he said they can only be inported from japan

I think he is playing with your balls there......ya cant pull a figure out of your ass like that....

EG. 85% of percentages are made up on the spot :)

Jez

ye i know its obviously not spot on, but he was full ravin on about this non turbo, and they have heaps of turbo versions too.. he was saying obviously not a turbo, but with the racing chip it is barley different? anyone actually put a racing chip in an n/a that can tell me what its like?

hey guys, i went to another dealership today to test drive the n/a r34.. ive never driven a non turbo skyline before, and wasnt expecting anything great.. but was i wrong, the r34 gt coupe went awsome, i was really suprised at how well it responded, how well it handled, and really how its not far of a turbo with minimal mods.. really ive read people saying how slow n/a skylines are??? compared to what ? the gtr? i really highly rated it, performance and comfort.. the tip tronic was also very very smooth,

the chip thing sounds rubbish, regardless there's not much use for australian fuel - unless you can find someone to tune it.

and in regards to your test drive, yes its quite true - the na skylines aren't crap. it's mainly all the turbo boys playing them down - stock for stock, there's about ~30-40rwkw difference.

its just when they start adding more and more boost is where their power comes in. and thats where the difference between the two types is, cost to power ratio.

boost is practically free in regards to gaining power, however then you have to take into account fuel economy, longevity and maintenance (and hence supporting mods like an intercooler, oil cooler, regular oil changes, etc). with a turbo motor you can simply hide the "faults" so to speak by adding more boost, where as the methods for extracting power from an na comes down to every last kilowatt - and you are essentially making a more breathable, rev happy, and most importantly REFINED motor. (similar theory also applies to turbos, better dump pipe, better manifold, etc)

that is my opinion in a nut shell, obviously if you want to get into technicals you can.

hey guys, i went to another dealership today to test drive the n/a r34.. ive never driven a non turbo skyline before, and wasnt expecting anything great.. but was i wrong, the r34 gt coupe went awsome, i was really suprised at how well it responded, how well it handled, and really how its not far of a turbo with minimal mods.. really ive read people saying how slow n/a skylines are??? compared to what ? the gtr? i really highly rated it, performance and comfort.. the tip tronic was also very very smooth,

Did you test both the turbo and na?

With the question about rev limiter the R34 Auto's when in triptronic mode it will shift if it thinks it needs to, but only at the last minute....

EG: I get to about 80km before it forces into 2nd gear but i can always shove it back into 1st, but the gearbox is trying to tell me it wants a higher gear.

Same when down shifting if it wants a lower gear it will do it automatically.

There is very little lag in changing of the gears if any, I mainly use the gear knob in tiptronic mode but the steering wheel controls are just as good (once you turn them on)

I do alot of h'wy driving and peek hour driving in Sydney and Central Coast so the auto was way more pratical for myself but on the h'way a manual would be so much better as the R34 auto's only have 4 speed gearbox and I dont think they have overdrive unless it is automatic as there is no button to turn it on and off.

Just incase different years are different I have a 98 R34 GT-T Sedan.

Drew.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...